IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] WG adoption call for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis

Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 25 February 2021 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A92A3A15A2 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:30:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2u1Z54dnekX9 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:30:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0F643A15A4 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:30:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id 2so953377ljr.5 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:30:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=8Hk/kpRrwmvx5NXh0gYpBFLBQFiA8yNghnY/pE1jDBM=; b=ji/matiaBpXP8RgSCcHS/A96sT2afRCnKE/03shno3DnySd6xBG66T9hqoEZ/Z+1V0 J2ncEsC8LodRNXYd8QI3QjdM4NwnbdBE3qEYqm5wXWsrEbUd1XYjzzDk/wJwdJTQncDq o6mlAe5j3AIdb4c9CmjBndZj7Ujg883TQ53zuTS3OvUdPJTRPsAHWpHPdiZOMoT+NyaC +YU9tFxTFjrpmaZyHGjwCe79QMIGr62GW+tIaPTOp2kNKBCC7hxEkuxk6FnOhm+HycDK W78Z8tFIlCw2V1y0KCNtd85yjC8xlVjsgghDpebKUNrPz6rBVSnIPmCj9s0q8D6Z+I5S EFaw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=8Hk/kpRrwmvx5NXh0gYpBFLBQFiA8yNghnY/pE1jDBM=; b=OGbCSxD/Nq9dbFudlJi94S52l+P8amFRDY9UfOLa2SzttJqyOZNI/MA2htOIvL0kw9 RPOyUK01aEx772QYS8QP016hdmWmL1tnu9i5BVZnZzQ5EiOR+bdyw3wDifbQoPwVk4lw eq0PuSapX9etrBK6V86lgH5tcLzyyQDQ86fs68mPcDUOZjDsSfd4a3akFP1mdKxS7AH+ 1YZnljs2ZeaPnrfHB4rHpGPgVdEzarH4ORFkrICbsr9bI0HK1B0lR8hbrkRtBTVCAehb sZokupTxR0b755LSCVEHi4brY7scFV0m3FbTfgNDwqp1LmSPfL9WTb2eawnIqWDwY4Ho XdVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533agBYN24Dp5YX5bZGwsVjuOyjFoHLpTAoGFCmUNTdrHUww66yE ZDAc6EDO/9ybjOln1OCQN2ZcPi+4BbA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybqNU2DIR5cUbjERsLwJbea0FyYAJxTIpDehjBEBfVloTaZSduzY9SpvUDWzEWJMWKTvHX9g==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:88cb:: with SMTP id a11mr1053474ljk.394.1614241803600; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:30:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from buildpc ([93.188.44.203]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d6sm1006196ljg.5.2021.02.25.00.30.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:30:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
To: 'Tero Kivinen' <kivinen@iki.fi>, ipsec@ietf.org
References: <24630.25622.894368.540704@fireball.acr.fi>
In-Reply-To: <24630.25622.894368.540704@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:30:05 +0300
Message-ID: <0f7201d70b50$6bf8ddc0$43ea9940$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQFryKB8PP6TLXbAXoLjE1rOrILtAas++EjA
Content-Language: ru
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/07u9JQSoa-iH2KT33WfaLdxaZEI>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WG adoption call for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:30:07 -0000

Hi,

as co-author I support adoption of this document.

Regards,
Valery.

> This is the start of 1.5 week WG adoption call for this document,
> ending 2021-02-07 (just before our IPsecME session in IETF 110).
> Please send your reply about whether you support adopting this
> document as WG document or not.
> 
> Our charter has item for:
> 
> 	RFC8229, published in 2017, specifies how to encapsulate IKEv2
> 	and ESP traffic in TCP. Implementation experience has revealed
> 	that not all situations are covered in RFC8229, and that may
> 	lead to interoperability problems or to suboptimal
> 	performance. The WG will provide a document to give
> 	implementors more guidance about how to use reliable stream
> 	transport in IKEv2 and clarify some issues that have been
> 	discovered. A possible starting point is
> 	draft-smyslov-ipsecme-tcp-guidelines.
> 
> and during that process we decided it might be better to do full bis
> version of the RFC8229 instead of just providing some kind of
> guidelines document. This work is that bis document.
> --
> kivinen@iki.fi
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email