IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPsec] WG adoption call for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Wed, 24 February 2021 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641FF3A1664 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 06:35:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=iki.fi
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yu5DWXeMiPn7 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 06:35:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from meesny.iki.fi (meesny.iki.fi [195.140.195.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 563E73A1665 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 06:35:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fireball.acr.fi (fireball.kivinen.iki.fi [IPv6:2001:1bc8:100d::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kivinen) by meesny.iki.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A788200EB for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:35:03 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iki.fi; s=meesny; t=1614177303; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fg37ytZ0k0kVke/yEeCjOjqCchbRo59W7l5oyBnv2j8=; b=aIvV/TedH8ykl5JWcfpDArwICjniinE5NGIBI+3XzMuCgdrcJ3yOQjKw46Hong8K3XoRMy j5MY4IU9GmNlAGAxhX5OGRSiG/AathXST5LKF8SojN02n9w+JFABiZsJcEneNz1V6SaFl7 APIUsSc3koIQwWI7gLtv15txcg8NQ8Q=
Received: by fireball.acr.fi (Postfix, from userid 15204) id E522325C17E7; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:35:02 +0200 (EET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <24630.25622.894368.540704@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:35:02 +0200
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 26.3 (x86_64--netbsd)
X-Edit-Time: 5 min
X-Total-Time: 9 min
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=meesny; d=iki.fi; t=1614177303; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=htJS01ahxZkPKXZewimBF5OGYujZp8aa8U0NUxUmExPHGeQVMvKfUVB7LXmPy0f8MXlDyX RkVjG8nQcW0FioPOhTlcOHW5sowwOmP9Gy8n4xLZxZ+GJXWkPUq4MPQ9nG77m+g2uDtLVG rhWZFLXgNG3eeVBWOU2qgg7kqHt18/k=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iki.fi; s=meesny; t=1614177303; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fg37ytZ0k0kVke/yEeCjOjqCchbRo59W7l5oyBnv2j8=; b=Jdjw37hDnq/O0tU23g/9ezmbCclaIjDosvzMxweuqhb5OOHmN/eRm9o1IVi+i6Hsvd+Pqd CWLwk5SLskx27jehyKWl8RSKiYMnygZB4160fCZi3AIqLpaFj3jP0n/P/3IgbHsOXi0ge8 RlB6xmqQo0rvWaZHhZM0/xzxDndEpmE=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=kivinen smtp.mailfrom=kivinen@iki.fi
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/mn0t0eJZW-xl3AcbmOPUpFm-UtA>
Subject: [IPsec] WG adoption call for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:35:08 -0000

This is the start of 1.5 week WG adoption call for this document,
ending 2021-02-07 (just before our IPsecME session in IETF 110).
Please send your reply about whether you support adopting this
document as WG document or not.

Our charter has item for:

	RFC8229, published in 2017, specifies how to encapsulate IKEv2
	and ESP traffic in TCP. Implementation experience has revealed
	that not all situations are covered in RFC8229, and that may
	lead to interoperability problems or to suboptimal
	performance. The WG will provide a document to give
	implementors more guidance about how to use reliable stream
	transport in IKEv2 and clarify some issues that have been
	discovered. A possible starting point is
	draft-smyslov-ipsecme-tcp-guidelines.

and during that process we decided it might be better to do full bis
version of the RFC8229 instead of just providing some kind of
guidelines document. This work is that bis document.
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email