IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] WG adoption call for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis

Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 10 March 2021 09:04 UTC

Return-Path: <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F12E3A1FB6 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:04:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aQOVeNH80fHL for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:04:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97A0B3A1FB5 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:04:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id u4so32256162lfs.0 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:04:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=/gx4V51tPRqTG2XM4Uaxvk02aZB4w6jE5vp+i14Ve38=; b=WC0Q/PYci1wTrawv0uF8xylND7NO8KyLxgziUTehMIW2PCJxIDl45Lambw9TkmbXyV zVJSiyLSujXLGqs/ruGTLW7Pp5qhVB1nrY7NdkskhFUhkdQpYmLwn4WJ0C/7ZnCHRbyV VbNL3v7JQcvgeh+1kPL/iq4l9Y22qj27JQDg6kpd5OPcVhZFnea090bkEALPlyuFV99C GA1f1poff3iKiSaSo71AOO16Q7Xob6X6m2cujKog3fBZZj6LmZ0NTwYTCugtbNDgdQIJ x+B8dSrvELE1jeRjOouayuMjszrJbDvXDdyzyfTfOLeppAXhasCaZydoTrxZqxx5iDRu e4Rw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=/gx4V51tPRqTG2XM4Uaxvk02aZB4w6jE5vp+i14Ve38=; b=cnyjGQCWy1Qen7mGyMRMpbmrIv2tVtoF29ivIRBG1+rFsDRpj784Cqev9TYdE7Kkl4 ffPgyDdMiZwiqCnE5BCch1aPbNxKfLnFZjtYcz7QaKiGVfxZTQ4oMgs4ftU/8US5Pxzf Z1ineL3zoIPVV6QdDj66hmnPaZkEWZnGEyznHoor7+U8FL+6eMWKjUqQCC3uTYIzkIcm 3pdETv4Da5Zfr+UYq7g7cR5U8xi38vopsIuKuOQ0EOZ7Oah7mx6MBO5lfNe27ukHzSZ5 umVh/gyYwq5oter3V5B3oxqgtALmD45gdtKi9qCagxxd4By28cbrOl9F3z9CVsZltirU UWTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532EFHlTpPmNOVfwpMPLjtsL1uN8eqDmbYiV8TuHCcm6qS8Kg9k6 Wr5p/Icot9sWyWHNbONnqn6UH04gUew=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCm0jF0nTBuq7m2UMT0zCmSN6RuHFcNa59XoNlvuYdwqOXKhvaCnk0Y3hAZ6Jm01HrAiSRVQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:47ef:: with SMTP id b15mr1363135lfp.615.1615367085539; Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:04:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from buildpc ([82.138.51.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t2sm2666875lfp.292.2021.03.10.01.04.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Mar 2021 01:04:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
To: 'Tero Kivinen' <kivinen@iki.fi>, ipsec@ietf.org
References: <24630.25622.894368.540704@fireball.acr.fi>
In-Reply-To: <24630.25622.894368.540704@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:04:40 +0300
Message-ID: <001b01d7158c$67c18720$37449560$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQFryKB8PP6TLXbAXoLjE1rOrILtAatThgDw
Content-Language: ru
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/fz51vsG6n4L191hiCTwmFVO8fiE>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WG adoption call for draft-smyslov-ipsecme-rfc8229bis
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 09:04:50 -0000

Hi,

the 1.5 week period is over and nobody objected the adoption.
Is there any reason the draft is not WG document yet?

Regards,
Valery.

> This is the start of 1.5 week WG adoption call for this document,
> ending 2021-02-07 (just before our IPsecME session in IETF 110).
> Please send your reply about whether you support adopting this
> document as WG document or not.
> 
> Our charter has item for:
> 
> 	RFC8229, published in 2017, specifies how to encapsulate IKEv2
> 	and ESP traffic in TCP. Implementation experience has revealed
> 	that not all situations are covered in RFC8229, and that may
> 	lead to interoperability problems or to suboptimal
> 	performance. The WG will provide a document to give
> 	implementors more guidance about how to use reliable stream
> 	transport in IKEv2 and clarify some issues that have been
> 	discovered. A possible starting point is
> 	draft-smyslov-ipsecme-tcp-guidelines.
> 
> and during that process we decided it might be better to do full bis
> version of the RFC8229 instead of just providing some kind of
> guidelines document. This work is that bis document.
> --
> kivinen@iki.fi
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email