Re: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 28 October 2019 18:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D08B120904 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nUyS-1vBlc1z for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com (mail-wm1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55E361208FB for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id 6so330902wmf.0 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=z5nh16PlSurD2p1ViViijOPaLAGSxNYqCXtbKGXH9oU=; b=OogLSWsXBXZRm485WxH/3+124WRZP9K3AJXNqwSD/LVSf9/rzmgeOGmKW8MovSv3xw aGGFZ+fGRo6nD+pUNk0b5cQeD/hGFEEZ/k6MUxb79EYasvVL8A30WNB0W9TeILieLuTB 1blWJc1LKL3ElOXFm0z4QZAMe7WB2CuH2ODCXqcUE+0lkjFqo1ApEUU+iNH4wHqOm0XM 8GeAQ7YBhrwvOaHW1Uq3Obv6Q8iD4gb0+vYoU/5KQSRastYY4RRHJ0h6wdOmBOdAe8Wd iYC/gPNsSQl0Z0tjjDzsmDwkvq5h8Avh4I/8R0OCtZJxQeA3fpVaBgNRqB01H1yjaLos 5n4w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=z5nh16PlSurD2p1ViViijOPaLAGSxNYqCXtbKGXH9oU=; b=mUh02Z0iaq35oUgHI5fiMnVanjnYhuG0Cf+IN+LoK+X9hdr1egiTiNLmfrD+IoQMkQ CV+5MTge5GBAJcvyZ7j+vK0pn0ppL62Val5k8A7IQu0XoNDGwmuljwbMYbHD4w4B/e/u c5iU9FfHUMKrcOGzLmFej+SH1pVoz8JEWDvavyQBe91OleB1kXvqxj+yK87D1bxRF6Md sisp6TeqGP+C3fI1YjhW5Mt8nG1g3YmiIPircNQhS8ZaDHO1Oojo08RJjsYQOkDneGHJ q7w189Cug1t+tnCINx5jcUtSJrJggqpmrc3jfZRufZwwXce+KX5+njWMnBYK30L3iwLU ckDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUGl/y5N7vMOZo/vSH73WDH3ElwSICkCbutA1MFNK1CnGIsapGM i80a3O+j/bGRZrQJGGFPmd8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwdGcZORY21aPgMFzFtEjsUCU4vzr0L/jQXUyRXHoILR/3WIq3h0WeoPJsbip6bxS7er5NcdQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:8055:: with SMTP id b82mr704048wmd.176.1572288966864; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] ([46.120.57.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 126sm425359wma.48.2019.10.28.11.56.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3594.4.19\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <23988.25468.681313.594115@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 20:56:02 +0200
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0E43F185-CB3B-4751-96C6-D3C311507AA5@gmail.com>
References: <23988.25468.681313.594115@fireball.acr.fi>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3594.4.19)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/1ZXHJ8GziSp39IeHwMH5F10ifxA>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 18:56:18 -0000

I have read the -01 version of this draft.  I believe it addresses a useful use case and that the solution presented there is a good starting point.

I support its adoption.

Yoav

> On 26 Oct 2019, at 18:17, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> wrote:
> 
> So this is fast (one week) adoption call for the
> draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs draft to be accepted to the WG document. We
> did have quite positive feedback in last IETF meeting and the charter
> item is being worked on in parallel to this call.
> 
> If you support adopting this document as WG document and as a starting
> place for the charter item proposed for the WG, then send email
> indicating your support to the ipsec@ietf.org mailing-list. If you
> have any comments or reservations send them to list too.
> 
> This adoption call finishes at 2019-11-04.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The demand for Traffic Flow Confidentiality has been increasing in the user
> community; however, the current method defined in RFC4303 (i.e., add null
> padding to each ESP payload) is very inefficient in it's use of network
> resources. The working group will develop an alternative TFC solution that
> provides for efficient use of network resources.
> -- 
> kivinen@iki.fi
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec