IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 29 October 2019 23:11 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881E8120132 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l_a_GxGM1N2z for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D559120119 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472nQz2lDCzFck; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:11:55 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1572390715; bh=r5UMJQaHQRme3CTsCx7YfMwWctpVYd7vfCn8vX+pMUE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=ggtlcpLRcwmZgoyTkune6tp2TiIlLOUK7c1D7V+TAHhr7aSH1A//KJBpwLD0pz3Vf bT3wR8YBc7UM12COYbJbGDumilm3P2CyRhS7fgPh6uwP5YZt3hJANKOW7qnI2YauTt j6Cc1UMAPOs2PQThG2kPKrDAq5Iw6/evyMCTtbx4=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4pO0Xpy6iYQT; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:11:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:11:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2DD60606AA31; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:11:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A25F65E69; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:11:52 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:11:52 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
cc: ipsec@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <23988.25468.681313.594115@fireball.acr.fi>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1910291910120.1249@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <23988.25468.681313.594115@fireball.acr.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/_2uFEAh4s5m_HbrhWtTiJ0I6RVQ>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 23:12:00 -0000

On Sat, 26 Oct 2019, Tero Kivinen wrote:

> So this is fast (one week) adoption call for the
> draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs draft to be accepted to the WG document. We
> did have quite positive feedback in last IETF meeting and the charter
> item is being worked on in parallel to this call.

I'm in favour of adopting this document to work on in the WG.

I'm very nervous about the current document's requirement of a new IP
protocol number, and would hope the WG can find a way to avoid that.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email