IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Sun, 27 October 2019 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60FF12012A for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 07:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WQGy2U3SCU8N for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 07:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.25.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C378E120122 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 07:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw15.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.15]) by gproxy1.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993E3F4013F52 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 08:05:50 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id OjB0iN5MPXy4mOjB0iHr1X; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 08:05:50 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=QYRIQPTv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10:nop_charset_1 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10:nop_ipv6 a=XobE76Q3jBoA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Vy_oeq2dmq0A:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=HJ2gHA37ykDUxFPf0CQA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10:nop_charset_2 a=gPXq3GBd8ssA:10:uccc_2email_address a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NJ/jSLylRHmq6mDE5k2wdCLlu0NzBEY7J0i7f8Nff2A=; b=eMWsc+Ne74ah65Mwhs6lTvrPEj pNuQ1Aw1qX47fBgjlaRC/J14ZzWnyri+g6/VfUr1ua+kTQLtm+MHFYpWnsjir41TCTr2+AV/jkidq E+lldnKygT4cMpAjGT+VfspR1;
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=24141 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1iOjB0-0038jy-9t; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 08:05:50 -0600
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>, ipsec@ietf.org
References: <23988.25468.681313.594115@fireball.acr.fi>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <c87b5fb7-fcab-df3b-641d-fa3e29cdaf8d@labn.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 10:05:45 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <23988.25468.681313.594115@fireball.acr.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Source-L: Yes
X-Exim-ID: 1iOjB0-0038jy-9t
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: ([IPv6:::1]) [127.0.0.1]:24141
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 5
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/OI7CrjELuE0IwxtLRojm53QIOkU>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 14:05:54 -0000

Hi,

I support adoption and the charter addition.  (No surprise as I'm a 
contributor to this work.)

Also, I know of no IPR that applies to this draft.

Lou

On 10/26/2019 11:17 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> So this is fast (one week) adoption call for the
> draft-hopps-ipsecme-iptfs draft to be accepted to the WG document. We
> did have quite positive feedback in last IETF meeting and the charter
> item is being worked on in parallel to this call.
>
> If you support adopting this document as WG document and as a starting
> place for the charter item proposed for the WG, then send email
> indicating your support to the ipsec@ietf.org mailing-list. If you
> have any comments or reservations send them to list too.
>
> This adoption call finishes at 2019-11-04.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The demand for Traffic Flow Confidentiality has been increasing in the user
> community; however, the current method defined in RFC4303 (i.e., add null
> padding to each ESP payload) is very inefficient in it's use of network
> resources. The working group will develop an alternative TFC solution that
> provides for efficient use of network resources.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email