Re: [IPsec] IPsec HA problem statement

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 26 April 2010 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1244B3A6C4F for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RAuSM7e1jN9v for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com (mail-ew0-f224.google.com [209.85.219.224]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0879C28C287 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so3595271ewy.13 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:27:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1b1i45EMJmnuYAnF+eoO+HVtb0cgSNlrsPA7IMTTJcY=; b=N4Y6krpdZOW3cTOybtHWUZbP4u+dRl1nsW7RqjXaDrRF4dMVz3HWWY3BZTX5Ria9Ua mMOdi/vS3ihewt7br/MgCU3ti2YGsCL7WgjUSZR9hMuNxxnrVyjX30KUpS9/1DP/bUkN S2mOFqkqa5GwBHpY8z4Ug6csd4msUlWN6G6To=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=s8booRZBYRXAdjE4PxOeKm4qyrYGg7bzLoHmYf0pU+t3Nk/8n0LK/owX+mfnnaHaTT JZAHChj05NpkwitwTWu2Wth84t3H6OkSkOVxXpcSWoMPRqPJLfXPVmVWDUmr4dkwUZx+ qEBrIdaOAZ/dXloouCul8GG257FTP5gLMCoJE=
Received: by 10.103.66.9 with SMTP id t9mr2347367muk.73.1272292062724; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.3] (bzq-79-181-18-85.red.bezeqint.net [79.181.18.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w5sm17343354mue.54.2010.04.26.07.27.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
To: ipsec <ipsec@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <1271864821.6636.55.camel@yaronf-linux>
References: <1271864821.6636.55.camel@yaronf-linux>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:27:39 +0300
Message-ID: <1272292059.2347.12.camel@yaronf-linux>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPsec HA problem statement
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:49:11 -0000

Hi,

There has been very little follow-on discussion on this draft, just a
few mails related to one proposed solution. So if you've read the draft
and think it's complete and good to go into WGLC, let us all know. If
some things are still missing, tell us which. Different vendors have
different views, and Yoav's problem statement may not cover them all.

Thanks,
	Yaron

On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:47 +0300, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we've had a useful discussion on HA terminology, and Yoav published a
> new version of the draft:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha-02.
> 
> We'd like to move it forward ASAP so we can get into the fun protocol
> stuff. So, before we go into WG LC, I'd like to have the group's inputs
> on the completeness of the draft: are we missing anything that'll come
> back to bite us as we discuss the protocol?
> 
> Thanks,
> 	Yaron