Re: [IPsec] IPsec HA problem statement

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 03 May 2010 02:13 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B763A6B84 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 May 2010 19:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.268
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.268 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.821, BAYES_80=2, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W-pvBEqoz+61 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 May 2010 19:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEBB3A6B73 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 May 2010 19:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.158] (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o432CirU044159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 2 May 2010 19:12:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240801c803e16cd7e8@[10.20.30.158]>
In-Reply-To: <1272292059.2347.12.camel@yaronf-linux>
References: <1271864821.6636.55.camel@yaronf-linux> <1272292059.2347.12.camel@yaronf-linux>
Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 19:12:42 -0700
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>, ipsec <ipsec@ietf.org>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPsec HA problem statement
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 02:13:03 -0000

At 5:27 PM +0300 4/26/10, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>There has been very little follow-on discussion on this draft, just a
>few mails related to one proposed solution. So if you've read the draft
>and think it's complete and good to go into WGLC, let us all know. If
>some things are still missing, tell us which. Different vendors have
>different views, and Yoav's problem statement may not cover them all.

...and there was no response to Yaron's plea.

Have we lost steam? Is the draft really ready to go?

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium