IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPsec] IPsec HA draft

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 21 April 2010 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E43F28C32F for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q9SiuZtVUPpQ for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5089D3A6B6F for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 22so2329510fge.13 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:content-type :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KIjWW1ral3A1Pr4l6/PL2h21kTaVZiUm1ayBx3d1FPE=; b=L0EslzBuwV+7UwVQRv/bTnPpe0YEo5c2FBU7VfKgM5RwWl2HTo+sWhuO0HUZG9fq99 T/YMrzkBychdePIkv7q44gjqVWqkHWrpAnYFR9NnkiD2YHbeZpZCe5+Y4riv9elgho75 JDJj2lP6NuB/GBPdWJxz+K31Mex4ThWJq/3Mw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=rPumWUZUAd/5ys6j9Q/48RhiJolhRJHOjSUKxp5Yod098P0gcqB2rnZIf5bPXdprU4 CVT1zSLFGvQ2IPyWZDHf9LKchX+aHJ15/dyUT+1wgb2sSmdQ4x3B82G+6aCcVNI+/YHT u3DFuCqnKvwNXh1K1TBU3P/1twrz4EHZo72CI=
Received: by 10.223.18.154 with SMTP id w26mr270037faa.39.1271864826989; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.3] (bzq-79-181-18-85.red.bezeqint.net [79.181.18.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 18sm5274210fkq.34.2010.04.21.08.47.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
To: ipsec <ipsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:47:01 +0300
Message-ID: <1271864821.6636.55.camel@yaronf-linux>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [IPsec] IPsec HA draft
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:15:57 -0000

Hi,

we've had a useful discussion on HA terminology, and Yoav published a
new version of the draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha-02.

We'd like to move it forward ASAP so we can get into the fun protocol
stuff. So, before we go into WG LC, I'd like to have the group's inputs
on the completeness of the draft: are we missing anything that'll come
back to bite us as we discuss the protocol?

Thanks,
	Yaron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email