IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPsec] Survey for WG interest in adopting draft-mglt-ipsecme-clone-ike-sa

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Fri, 28 November 2014 13:14 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A83E1A1B5F for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 05:14:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.131
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.131 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6CUvmKhD88Km for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 05:14:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.kivinen.iki.fi [IPv6:2001:1bc8:100d::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39B591A1B66 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 05:14:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id sASDEMxa003817 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:14:22 +0200 (EET)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id sASDEKlH000762; Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:14:20 +0200 (EET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <21624.29996.851926.333259@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:14:20 +0200
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <FC0E9543-B2FE-48FE-8CBD-D3BDF2AA2B96@vpnc.org>
References: <FC0E9543-B2FE-48FE-8CBD-D3BDF2AA2B96@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64--netbsd)
X-Edit-Time: 3 min
X-Total-Time: 1 min
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/3PVyrgfLTE2SqJX4WTTaWDVy8xs
Cc: IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: [IPsec] Survey for WG interest in adopting draft-mglt-ipsecme-clone-ike-sa
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 13:14:25 -0000

Paul Hoffman writes:
> Greetings again. The "Clone IKE SA" proposal tries to optimize IKE
> SA setup in cases where VPN gateways have multiple interfaces and
> want to establish different SAs on the different interfaces without
> having to repeat the IKE authentication. Instead, they could clone a
> single IKE SA multiple times, and then move it to different
> interfaces using MOBIKE. 
> 
> If you agree with the need to standardize this usage, and believe
> that draft-mglt-ipsecme-clone-ike-sa is likely to be a good starting
> place for that standardization, and are willing to review and
> contribute text to the document if it is adopted by the WG, please
> say so on the list.

I support adopting this document for WG draft, or just go forward as
individual submission. I have already reviewed this draft, and I think
it is mostly ready already, so we could even start WG or IETF last
call almost immediately.
-- 
kivinen@iki.fi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email