Re: [IPsec] Survey for WG interest in adopting draft-mglt-ipsecme-clone-ike-sa

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 02 December 2014 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774A01A872F for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:20:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2UvRaZ3m6Sz6 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:20:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68EE71A1A86 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:20:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id r20so22363679wiv.8 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:20:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kcMbaFsuJz0tE0+UG1zpxrkuWFST2+z/g1mTmifZuBI=; b=ELl5YLmGvGAYWcVqB8nwvVVjW8KJdcKiOP1oIhupS4IeGsHr3S1HpRWOk2fOq7rxK5 vIu/mKn/XSB74Vc1wpOzVcuap+5Ozt3u0snfutc7ZqdpANHCuXY+k+FT1gZSjpaKn2NP jHU760lJls59PDMZc45LyFZegMEvChVty+7Yl0tQXxJw4yYeoTObcQEZWefaOrjXpxBF tvmYpnGDWv6n08+V2VZ//1VtzRviqQ9S0hMk/KqSaazOZ/4ufeF0C998oawKKXVAUxcq GUQ8jT+CR0SOM5dJ3N0MzWhMWYLrsZj1cI7lKcedkfUw3TejRtP9pxQCaDqWHbw/u6s9 ITyA==
X-Received: by 10.180.218.39 with SMTP id pd7mr8334446wic.21.1417555235044; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:20:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.9] (bzq-79-176-33-71.red.bezeqint.net. [79.176.33.71]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wv8sm33356355wjc.44.2014.12.02.13.20.34 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:20:34 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <547E2D21.2070600@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 23:20:33 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
References: <FC0E9543-B2FE-48FE-8CBD-D3BDF2AA2B96@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <FC0E9543-B2FE-48FE-8CBD-D3BDF2AA2B96@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/VxmCIW2Y4k6ztDlV8RIQ0kisMqA
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Survey for WG interest in adopting draft-mglt-ipsecme-clone-ike-sa
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 21:20:39 -0000

And similarly for this draft: please speak up if you're interested in 
this document and are willing to contribute as co-author or reviewer.

Thanks,
	Yaron

On 11/25/2014 10:06 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> <chair hats on>
>
> Greetings again. The "Clone IKE SA" proposal tries to optimize IKE SA setup in cases where VPN gateways have multiple interfaces and want to establish different SAs on the different interfaces without having to repeat the IKE authentication. Instead, they could clone a single IKE SA multiple times, and then move it to different interfaces using MOBIKE.
>
> If you agree with the need to standardize this usage, and believe that draft-mglt-ipsecme-clone-ike-sa is likely to be a good starting place for that standardization, and are willing to review and contribute text to the document if it is adopted by the WG, please say so on the list. This WG has a history of adopting documents but then not having enough reviewers for us to feel confident that we are making a good standard, so we need to see a reasonable number of actively interested people before we adopt the document. If it is not adopted, the authors can ask for it to be published as an RFC through individual submission or by the Independent Submissions Editor.
>
> Please reply by December 8, 2015.
>
> --Paul Hoffman and Yaron Sheffer
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>