IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Please save the pre-shared key mode

Jan Vilhuber <vilhuber@cisco.com> Fri, 07 December 2001 22:41 UTC

Received: from lists.tislabs.com (portal.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.101]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fB7Mff218535; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:41:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA06463 Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:58:35 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 14:07:13 -0800
From: Jan Vilhuber <vilhuber@cisco.com>
To: Ricky Charlet <rcharlet@redcreek.com>
cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re: Please save the pre-shared key mode
In-Reply-To: <3C10104B.485198C@redcreek.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0112071405490.24375-100000@janpc-home.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Ricky Charlet wrote:

> Howdy,
> 
> 	I'm moving my position from 'in favor' to 'neutral' on saving a
> pre-shared key authentication mode. Its not PSK itself or even current
> look alike PSK functionality I'd like to see saved. There is a new
> feature I want to see added and that is interaction with legacy
> authentication systems in support of remote access users ala
> draft-ietf-ipsra-reqmts-04.txt.

But then we should close down IPSRA, shouldn't we? Either we have IPSRA to
take care of remote-access legacy methods, or we cancel that WG and fold the
requirements back into the IPsec WG...

jan
 --
Jan Vilhuber                                            vilhuber@cisco.com
Cisco Systems, San Jose                                     (408) 527-0847

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email