Re: Please save the pre-shared key mode

[Jan Vilhuber <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Ricky Charlet wrote:

> Jan Vilhuber wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Ricky Charlet wrote:
> > 
> > > Howdy,
> > >
> > >       I'm moving my position from 'in favor' to 'neutral' on saving a
> > > pre-shared key authentication mode. Its not PSK itself or even current
> > > look alike PSK functionality I'd like to see saved. There is a new
> > > feature I want to see added and that is interaction with legacy
> > > authentication systems in support of remote access users ala
> > > draft-ietf-ipsra-reqmts-04.txt.
> > 
> > But then we should close down IPSRA, shouldn't we? Either we have IPSRA to
> > take care of remote-access legacy methods, or we cancel that WG and fold the
> > requirements back into the IPsec WG...
> > 
> > jan
> >  --
> > Jan Vilhuber                                            [e-mail]
> > Cisco Systems, San Jose                                     [phone]
> 
> 
> 	Let the consequenses be what they may. Does our working group have the
> will to include IPSRA requirements into second generation IKE directly?

I've seen preciously little discussion about Cheryl's requirements document
in general...

jan



> I hope so.
> 
> 	(personally, I believe that IPSRA is close enough to finishing and the
> second generation IKE debate is new enough that we could get fielded
> implementations of PIC+IKEv1 which could inform our development of
> second generation IKE protocols).
> 
> 
> -- 
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
> 
>   Ricky Charlet   : SonicWall Inc.   : usa [phone]
> 

 --
Jan Vilhuber                                            [e-mail]
Cisco Systems, San Jose                                     [phone]