Re: Please review draft-ietf-pppext-l2tp-sec-03.txt

Karl Fox <karl@Ascend.COM> Fri, 20 March 1998 01:12 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id UAA23450 for ipsec-outgoing; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 20:12:41 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 17:24:44 -0800
Message-Id: <199803200124.RAA24796@gump.eng.ascend.com>
From: Karl Fox <karl@Ascend.COM>
To: Dave Johnson <dbj@cs.cmu.edu>
Cc: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>, ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: Please review draft-ietf-pppext-l2tp-sec-03.txt
In-Reply-To: <10242.890350021@ux6.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
References: <3.0.5.32.19980319123626.009666f0@homebase.htt-consult.com> <10242.890350021@ux6.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: Karl Fox <karl@Ascend.COM>
Organization: Ascend Communications
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

Dave Johnson writes:
> >I know we are busy, but the L2TP crowd is working on their use of IPsec for
> >protecting L2TP sessions.
> >
> >I do not mean at all to question the abilities of the L2TP wg, but I
> >suspect that there are many people here that are not on that list, and may
> >want to study this, the first use of IPsec by another wg.
> >
> >One interesting comment I have of this draft, is it does not actually
> >reference any of the IPsec documents.
> >
> >
> >Robert Moskowitz
> >ICSA
> >Security Interest EMail: rgm-sec@htt-consult.com
> 
> 
> I'm not sure who was "first", but Mobile IP for IPv6 also uses IPsec
> for authentication and replay protection on Binding Updates.  If any
> IPsec folks want to review the latest draft, it is available as
> draft-ietf-mobileip-ipv6-05.txt.  At least we reference the IPsec
> documents :-).

There is another PPPEXT document,

    draft-ietf-pppext-l2tp-security-01.txt

which does reference the IPSEC drafts.  It's also the L2TP security
document currently preferred by the working group.
-- 
Karl Fox, servant of God, employee of Ascend Communications
655 Metro Place South, Suite 370, Dublin, Ohio  43017   +1 614 760 4041