IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Please review draft-ietf-pppext-l2tp-sec-03.txt

Dave Johnson <dbj@cs.cmu.edu> Thu, 19 March 1998 23:13 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id SAA22617 for ipsec-outgoing; Thu, 19 Mar 1998 18:13:42 -0500 (EST)
To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 19 Mar 1998 12:36:26 EST" <3.0.5.32.19980319123626.009666f0@homebase.htt-consult.com>
From: Dave Johnson <dbj@cs.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: Dave Johnson <dbj@cs.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Please review draft-ietf-pppext-l2tp-sec-03.txt
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 18:27:01 -0500
Message-ID: <10242.890350021@ux6.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

>I know we are busy, but the L2TP crowd is working on their use of IPsec for
>protecting L2TP sessions.
>
>I do not mean at all to question the abilities of the L2TP wg, but I
>suspect that there are many people here that are not on that list, and may
>want to study this, the first use of IPsec by another wg.
>
>One interesting comment I have of this draft, is it does not actually
>reference any of the IPsec documents.
>
>
>Robert Moskowitz
>ICSA
>Security Interest EMail: rgm-sec@htt-consult.com


I'm not sure who was "first", but Mobile IP for IPv6 also uses IPsec
for authentication and replay protection on Binding Updates.  If any
IPsec folks want to review the latest draft, it is available as
draft-ietf-mobileip-ipv6-05.txt.  At least we reference the IPsec
documents :-).

					Dave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email