IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Early code point assignment

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 01 April 2015 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B951ACEB7 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T_A2aWn_33Ao for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22d.google.com (mail-pd0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 599731A8958 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pdbni2 with SMTP id ni2so59848110pdb.1 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FiMDTycyHsqI5el7ftaOZ8W5xJ9OvVvHcE3ZcxrTL+o=; b=YpnG71n72ueEnDM0tL0mdmbmy3TDHt6uQlyI8pXNlkqK2UmfZYBvrSH0TwrXpF1W0g oo6JmonWnU4w9+tPppQqgo7ByaXj5oucqIOpKyVC8vDgX9w0AuKjoivMmLU5lgI+TCxL 6O+reTS4+CP/cyHCNE9DTsvvWtxayvwKb2/jO5OLZIR6AY/rFAu1oDyJMdYdjeZ0IXlD dx7PyjOQFg8HciuqLo8X0Ny7ST1XWAOJKmfA/4Ltd7HPhmgdUUhj8kruqUQRAdHd5n52 x9GywFIZszmT+J4E/4cRxuvW2XcDfuF1aEX2cwSm4XvJRJwEkllWBtMF9wp4rYvJOO9x i4dQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.246.38 with SMTP id xt6mr78463935pbc.20.1427905480074; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.3.250] (50-203-213-210-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.203.213.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k9sm2576361pbq.46.2015.04.01.09.24.38 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <551C1BC5.102@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 09:24:37 -0700
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF IPsec <ipsec@ietf.org>
References: <20150330133237.21486.80504.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D7430231-BDAB-4766-8637-D4609634F3D3@gmail.com> <E7574C5A-B634-42EA-8E26-D3B7BBA4613D@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E7574C5A-B634-42EA-8E26-D3B7BBA4613D@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/6tdcvhFoP5iNPTdZ1u8msT2yGEE>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Early code point assignment
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:24:41 -0000

Not while the latest revision still has two TBDs, while we're still 
debating two interop-critical issues (padding, salt) and another major 
security issue (IV).

I don't want private use numbers any more than PaulW, but I also don't 
want errata like we had for TLS EtM.

We can iron out these issues within a week or two and then I'd be all in 
favor of a code point assignment.

Thanks,
	Yaron

On 04/01/2015 04:26 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
> OK, so this thread kind of got side-tracked about the name of the
> algorithm.  I think ENCR_CHACHA20_POLY1305 works for everybody.
>
> What about early code point assignment?
>
> Thanks
>
> Yoav
>
>> On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com
>> <mailto:ynir.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> One more thing.
>>
>> I would like to request early code point assignment for
>> ESP_ChaCha20-Poly1305.
>>
>> I know that it is the goal of the chairs to bring this to LC sooner
>> rather than later, but I would like to get started on implementation
>> sooner rather than later, and the IETF process takes three months at
>> best, and six months in the more common case.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Yoav
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email