Re: [IPsec] Proposed work item: IKE/IPsec high availability andload sharing

Hi,

I am willing to review multiple versions of the draft, contribute text
and co-author it.

Thanks
Jyothi

-----Original Message-----
From: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Jean-Michel Combes
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 12:10 AM
To: Yaron Sheffer
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Proposed work item: IKE/IPsec high availability
andload sharing

Hi,

After a discussion on the scope of this draft, I decided to change my
opinion regarding what I said during the IETF meeting: now, I am ready
to review the draft but no more to contribute to it.

Best regards.

JMC.

2009/11/29 Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com>:
> This work item will define the problem statement and requirements for 
> a solution that allows interoperable HA/LS device groups. Mixed-vendor

> clusters are specifically out of scope; but single-vendor clusters 
> should be fully interoperable with other vendors' devices or clusters.

> The main challenge is to overcome the strict use of sequence numbers 
> in both IPsec and IKE, in HA and LS scenarios. Following the Hiroshima

> discussion, the WI is initially focused on defining the problem, 
> rather than a particular solution.
>
>
>
> Proposed starting point:
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nir-ipsecme-ipsecha-00.txt.
>
>
>
> Please reply to the list:
>
>
>
> - If this proposal is accepted as a WG work item, are you committing 
> to review multiple versions of the draft?
>
> - Are you willing to contribute text to the draft?
>
> - Would you like to co-author it?
>
>
>
> Please also reply to the list if:
>
>
>
> - You believe this is NOT a reasonable activity for the WG to spend
time on.
>
>
>
> If this is the case, please explain your position. Do not explore the 
> fine technical details (which will change anyway, once the WG gets 
> hold of the draft); instead explain why this is uninteresting for the 
> WG or for the industry at large. Also, please mark the title clearly 
> (e.g. "DES40-export in IPsec - NO!").
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>
>
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec