Re: [IPsec] Proposed work item: IKE/IPsec high availability and load sharing

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Fri, 04 December 2009 03:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DAA3A699A for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:17:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.356
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.356 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.243, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PLS+7PZcy4Dj for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:17:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [67.23.6.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC693A6968 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:17:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C7DB342F5 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 22:10:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from marajade.sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B854E855 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 22:17:48 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B187F5C.6050102@sandelman.ca>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:17:48 -0500
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090706 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipsec@ietf.org
References: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC801BDF88E04F1@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
In-Reply-To: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC801BDF88E04F1@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Proposed work item: IKE/IPsec high availability and load sharing
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:17:58 -0000

Yaron Sheffer wrote:
> This work item will define the problem statement and requirements for a 
> solution that allows interoperable HA/LS device groups. Mixed-vendor 
> clusters are specifically out of scope; but single-vendor clusters 
> should be fully interoperable with other vendors’ devices or clusters. 
> The main challenge is to overcome the strict use of sequence numbers in 
> both IPsec and IKE, in HA and LS scenarios. Following the Hiroshima 
> discussion, the WI is initially focused on defining the problem, rather 
> than a particular solution.
> 
>  
> 
> Proposed starting point: 
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nir-ipsecme-ipsecha-00.txt.
> 
>  
> 
> Please reply to the list:

It is interesting work, and may well be valuable.
It is not a priority to me, and I would not have time to work on it.
I might read a WG FC, and I might respond to threads, if I came across
them.