Re: [IPsec] Proposed work item: IKE/IPsec high availability and load sharing

Hi,

After a discussion on the scope of this draft, I decided to change my
opinion regarding what I said during the IETF meeting: now, I am ready
to review the draft but no more to contribute to it.

Best regards.

JMC.

2009/11/29 Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com>:
> This work item will define the problem statement and requirements for a
> solution that allows interoperable HA/LS device groups. Mixed-vendor
> clusters are specifically out of scope; but single-vendor clusters should be
> fully interoperable with other vendors’ devices or clusters. The main
> challenge is to overcome the strict use of sequence numbers in both IPsec
> and IKE, in HA and LS scenarios. Following the Hiroshima discussion, the WI
> is initially focused on defining the problem, rather than a particular
> solution.
>
>
>
> Proposed starting point:
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nir-ipsecme-ipsecha-00.txt.
>
>
>
> Please reply to the list:
>
>
>
> - If this proposal is accepted as a WG work item, are you committing to
> review multiple versions of the draft?
>
> - Are you willing to contribute text to the draft?
>
> - Would you like to co-author it?
>
>
>
> Please also reply to the list if:
>
>
>
> - You believe this is NOT a reasonable activity for the WG to spend time on.
>
>
>
> If this is the case, please explain your position. Do not explore the fine
> technical details (which will change anyway, once the WG gets hold of the
> draft); instead explain why this is uninteresting for the WG or for the
> industry at large. Also, please mark the title clearly (e.g. "DES40-export
> in IPsec - NO!").
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>
>