IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPsec] Moving forward with draft-kivinen-ipsecme-signature-auth

Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com> Mon, 14 October 2013 08:24 UTC

Return-Path: <Johannes.Merkle@secunet.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0AD621E80C4 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 01:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-4BIqtAjW2h for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 01:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [195.81.216.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E0521F9DA1 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 01:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (alg1 [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45051A0071; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:24:32 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7Hcjblp2egwn; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:24:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-srv1.secumail.de (unknown [10.53.40.200]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996891A006C; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:24:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [172.16.40.201] ([172.16.40.201]) by mail-srv1.secumail.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:24:31 +0200
Message-ID: <525BAA3F.4070204@secunet.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:24:31 +0200
From: Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>, kivinen@iki.fi
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2013 08:24:31.0824 (UTC) FILETIME=[CEBA4500:01CEC8B6]
Subject: [IPsec] Moving forward with draft-kivinen-ipsecme-signature-auth
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 08:24:45 -0000

draft-kivinen-ipsecme-signature-auth-01 is about to expire. Given the current discussions on potential backdoors in NIST
curves (don't want to participate in these conspiracy theories though), signature algorithm flexibility may be even more
desirable.

Can we move forward with that draft? I am not sure if there have been considerable comments or objections.

Johannes

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email