Re: [IPsec] Moving forward with draft-kivinen-ipsecme-signature-auth

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 14 October 2013 21:23 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8640221F9C42 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MFAAH6jz7-IT for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC73F21E8138 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-0-66-41.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9ELNa3m059755 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:23:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-0-66-41.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.41] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <224E3077-9CF2-4517-BD0F-F73811436CE4@checkpoint.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:23:36 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AB1AB088-5BF4-4100-8C78-4F6AECAA5744@vpnc.org>
References: <525BAA3F.4070204@secunet.com> <224E3077-9CF2-4517-BD0F-F73811436CE4@checkpoint.com>
To: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Moving forward with draft-kivinen-ipsecme-signature-auth
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 21:23:40 -0000

On Oct 14, 2013, at 2:05 AM, Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> wrote:

> I agree. We should either adopt it in the WG or ask Sean to publish this as an individual submission.

The latter. We have spoken of this a number of times.

--Paul Hoffman