IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Moving forward with draft-kivinen-ipsecme-signature-auth

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Mon, 14 October 2013 09:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3622821E80B7 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 02:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e9BZp-vH7QeN for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 02:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AD221E8088 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 02:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.150]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r9E95UYF016684; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:05:30 +0300
X-CheckPoint: {525BB3CD-1A-1B221DC2-1FFFF}
Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.92]) by DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.3.173]) with mapi id 14.02.0347.000; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:05:22 +0300
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com>
Thread-Topic: [IPsec] Moving forward with draft-kivinen-ipsecme-signature-auth
Thread-Index: AQHOyLbdECChwNaWCUKxjIAThM1TtJnztVaA
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:05:22 +0000
Message-ID: <224E3077-9CF2-4517-BD0F-F73811436CE4@checkpoint.com>
References: <525BAA3F.4070204@secunet.com>
In-Reply-To: <525BAA3F.4070204@secunet.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [91.90.139.159]
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <155D6FBA0EC50D459810FC95B32EADD2@ad.checkpoint.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>, "<kivinen@iki.fi>" <kivinen@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Moving forward with draft-kivinen-ipsecme-signature-auth
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:05:56 -0000

I agree. We should either adopt it in the WG or ask Sean to publish this as an individual submission.

Yoav

On Oct 14, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Johannes Merkle <johannes.merkle@secunet.com> wrote:

> draft-kivinen-ipsecme-signature-auth-01 is about to expire. Given the current discussions on potential backdoors in NIST
> curves (don't want to participate in these conspiracy theories though), signature algorithm flexibility may be even more
> desirable.
> 
> Can we move forward with that draft? I am not sure if there have been considerable comments or objections.
> 
> Johannes
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email