Re: [IPsec] Candidate charter text is now in wiki

[Tero Kivinen <[e-mail]>]

[e-mail] writes:
> I was naively expecting a formal call to assess the
> interest/objections for each of the proposed items. Perhaps, I'm not
> the only one in that case. 

That could have been another possibility, but as I was so busy between
the last IETF and now, I didn't have time to do it. On the other hand
if there would have been lots of people really interested in the work
they might have already commented on the text... 

> I have one "logistic" question: if this proposed item is not
> included in the charter, does this mean that I can proceed with the
> code points assignment request
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-ipsecme-ipv6-ipv4-codes/)
> with IANA and the codes will be assigned? For the record, the only
> comments I received were from Paul (thanks), and an updated version
> of the draft that addresses those comments was released. 

It depends. If we do not take the item as official working group
chartered item, there are still few different options. You can either
get it processed as AD sponsored draft, or you can go individual
submission track.

To get the IANA numbers is separate from that as those numbers are
allocated by expert review.

Anyways lets see if there are other people interested to taking this
item as charter item or not.
-- 
[e-mail]