IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] IETF 96 IPsecME Agenda

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 07 July 2016 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CCD12D119 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 12:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hOFL4HP2udzw for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 12:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A96512D58A for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 12:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id n127so28535062wme.1 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3c0IT8+mkRh2cCHoBrwQTWs7o3kGLdT+ndj2b4Okk/A=; b=QWeXKYNTvWS2fiCMsD3VQluNhlofEn0vKicDen1gCTxg12wGw1/WPyPejWWm3M3Ufu r3CIz0TO2tcgJV0JA6bf9ZE2nS8jTKt6yMB7uV86wKGvg9+bMhaPSrmLGnpjY9Ci4G1h sq3MR/cT74mGbz33YivlzoOVdWrPzuOEXmlMFsMRx0iKb2EcKpn4TtsUH3t1le3jcNYt EHMpr6QBNjpyMbBeWpUWLLJU/bUB+xNa+HZLkH1V8epjqT5hoD/mH8x275eORHnw7xR0 GnAMgha7KxpxDeMBK6ksdtCKwf64PGeV8uLww4KJLv2EgUpIxHos4yHecF211/0rbTW1 O5MA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3c0IT8+mkRh2cCHoBrwQTWs7o3kGLdT+ndj2b4Okk/A=; b=C76CIPnkT+0PKSClk8b1/9Y1Y496Ti/f3l6k5UXVAGDRrYWNySYcxxCTNKlgwPjz70 5WmcPNuUkdthGqRLHrzsxeEaYHeWzgbXsZ4pb2N08zt6q2qRkHpXZC8H2O6sBpJKJ6XY nyWVl7/bVcja79gJgCBhMk5u5/LeCtsrfp+XdtS8W5jbWojqIL2Gsqh+m0ISAJDUP+9e 8auaR/zQA9E74rF0kKJqvBSVT9LgCX0cHkwhx60hRavMajY8t8SwGvYOp77rvESDQF0s HmYOTu7DT7oMd63THz9qmUVQSNUun5wVpUTljd54k5wVA63MqvetLHrZ3dlFNSmoiX3v hAVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tK+chYbTVyKzEzKZX/ArTDhdrb8g5uMyDGDwJbA3r88qARUGa8zDY5UtKhCqa/ojw==
X-Received: by 10.28.207.13 with SMTP id f13mr29030367wmg.53.1467920773568; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] ([46.120.57.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c74sm53359wme.1.2016.07.07.12.46.12 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR09MB0665B355B955789F4FA4D8BCF03B0@DM2PR09MB0665.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 22:46:10 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <74649517-AD27-465E-AA29-CF069F618CC9@gmail.com>
References: <DM2PR09MB0665B355B955789F4FA4D8BCF03B0@DM2PR09MB0665.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/FQxLpA00jBj9PsnC5E8MTEd1D2I>
Cc: IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IETF 96 IPsecME Agenda
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 19:46:25 -0000

> On 7 Jul 2016, at 9:57 PM, Waltermire, David A. (Fed) <david.waltermire@nist.gov> wrote:
> 
> We are scheduled for 2pm - 4pm CEST on Tuesday, July 19th.  The chairs need to pull together an agenda for this meeting. Here is an early draft to get us started:
> 
> 10 minutes: agenda, WG status
> 
> The following drafts are near done. Are the authors able to give a short status?
> 
> 5 minutes: status of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ddos-protection-07 - Ready to send to the IESG?
> 5 minutes: status of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-09 - Ready for WGLC?
> 5 minutes: status of draft-ietf-ipsecme-safecurves-01 - Ready for WGLC?

I can give a short status for them, but I think either Tero or Paul should give the status for rfc4307bis.

> 20 minutes: discussion of draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-00 - Newly adopted. More discussion needed? Ready for WGLC?
> 
> 30 minutes: discussion of draft-fluhrer-qr-ikev2-01 - The adoption call on draft-fluhrer-qr-ikev2-01 indicated strong interest in doing something in this space. We need to wrap up our adoption discussion and determine a path forward for WG activities in this space.
> 
> 20 minutes: charter text review - The chairs will send out revised charter text before the meeting for review prior to discussion.
> 
> This leaves 25 minutes extra. Are there any additional topics to discuss? ESP? Yang? Others?

I can talk about the EdDSA draft (draft-nir-ipsecme-eddsa). 

Yoav

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email