IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] IETF 96 IPsecME Agenda

Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com> Thu, 07 July 2016 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC04212D67F for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.198, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SbIzPJeA1rwS for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2F6E12D532 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id k123so6775446wme.0 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 14:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=LUigfeWg3KJ2Qz08d8ScnQYwDzvnep1Gn+1oxmgUcEQ=; b=Sk3wj+a0+TYCWnmssjVl9Rl5AQXKcahamiKlOlEwOLtjBdtE+b1yZWWGVfcwp9qdGo 97Y/8KpOMfZA/TlSbP8PMii/9QppF83PsW4kwi6p0nce0mtzb38Mrh0dc0fxu0kYPfWq aCe5PMAquBJR7ejUFzMbSl7nDEqc7V0519kWlSxs1yrkcD+gLDQCCjmQR88+pCGHWoZo FUVDksVWk3+ZDpRK/9K6BJiQs+MXngRLu0o091PbM6dKcx2rgNziHZU00vJr63QT5rXx ViGe6lpOZRgACEg76BDTUh+IIHRQ1gENWu0VaXZBzVYxvtRxxolZ71BIvMcW7kje4IIS Bpaw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LUigfeWg3KJ2Qz08d8ScnQYwDzvnep1Gn+1oxmgUcEQ=; b=TfXF28SFefzcXFzaxcsqNghYAWNv+mwHf5vIF3/cw0sEMD8SiK0e8qAvDxMK7xEQ+z E0SQNdJ1dzEVcYBUowiK1dhXkPM5fX4vYCh7DM5DgN195l7jQ3vh29QdN9JRlD/I9EBr XIlHtcDASkIVjL2Tf+wFELXHO3GJxuDY2tIZ5J7s5owx0ozw9EEZz2hIb14QOTyWXQsk NrQrzTi2KjuxGHPG8H7dTLbHy5UMu+2oomCrZaV1Al3uGFWI01WYtJqAdfZbyTTArtDK ksU6KxnTxpCrVeUoVJH1Vb9b10MdMYS310TWCbIfI1bRRzyahEqxnN4NGN+XBI0RQl3o tVkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIiRXGkqIg4oGG7eVph64ANuJrs0iJQVd8jcKLfGZ2Yz5NkA5coHqamun5iUxTQIWHZnve7j7s45YMbDA==
X-Received: by 10.28.213.145 with SMTP id m139mr37279wmg.81.1467928331015; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 14:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mglt.ietf@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.34.99 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <74649517-AD27-465E-AA29-CF069F618CC9@gmail.com>
References: <DM2PR09MB0665B355B955789F4FA4D8BCF03B0@DM2PR09MB0665.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <74649517-AD27-465E-AA29-CF069F618CC9@gmail.com>
From: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 17:52:10 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: E5-STHo_duAwKptmWVp_r5V1N0M
Message-ID: <CADZyTkmPrdTpbBUv5gt7sbF7ZOoy0E4UewDNXK09Mxt6v9YDVA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11469c16b9da91053712b2f7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/nj0W5tzR1W9Mm87-ccZItfaLq3M>
Cc: IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>, "Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IETF 96 IPsecME Agenda
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 21:52:15 -0000

Please also add:draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv.
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv/>

I (or Yoav) can also present about draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv.
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv/>
In addition draft-mglt-ipsecme-rfc7321bis can be presented by either of the
co-authors (Tero, Yoav, Paul or me).

BR,
Daniel
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv/>

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > On 7 Jul 2016, at 9:57 PM, Waltermire, David A. (Fed) <
> david.waltermire@nist.gov> wrote:
> >
> > We are scheduled for 2pm - 4pm CEST on Tuesday, July 19th.  The chairs
> need to pull together an agenda for this meeting. Here is an early draft to
> get us started:
> >
> > 10 minutes: agenda, WG status
> >
> > The following drafts are near done. Are the authors able to give a short
> status?
> >
> > 5 minutes: status of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ddos-protection-07 - Ready to
> send to the IESG?
> > 5 minutes: status of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-09 - Ready for WGLC?
> > 5 minutes: status of draft-ietf-ipsecme-safecurves-01 - Ready for WGLC?
>
> I can give a short status for them, but I think either Tero or Paul should
> give the status for rfc4307bis.
>
> > 20 minutes: discussion of draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-00 - Newly
> adopted. More discussion needed? Ready for WGLC?
> >
> > 30 minutes: discussion of draft-fluhrer-qr-ikev2-01 - The adoption call
> on draft-fluhrer-qr-ikev2-01 indicated strong interest in doing something
> in this space. We need to wrap up our adoption discussion and determine a
> path forward for WG activities in this space.
> >
> > 20 minutes: charter text review - The chairs will send out revised
> charter text before the meeting for review prior to discussion.
> >
> > This leaves 25 minutes extra. Are there any additional topics to
> discuss? ESP? Yang? Others?
>
> I can talk about the EdDSA draft (draft-nir-ipsecme-eddsa).
>
> Yoav
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email