IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] IETF 96 IPsecME Agenda

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 07 July 2016 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE35012D863 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 12:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.526
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.526 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hyQQAga_W79T for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 12:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A404E12D865 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 12:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3rlnGv33hZzCM3; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 21:09:11 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pzJU7dz2KdsO; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 21:09:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 21:09:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BCA4245C47E; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:09:09 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 bofh.nohats.ca BCA4245C47E
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B532C415FC83; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:09:09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 15:09:09 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: "Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR09MB0665B355B955789F4FA4D8BCF03B0@DM2PR09MB0665.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1607071504360.21181@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <DM2PR09MB0665B355B955789F4FA4D8BCF03B0@DM2PR09MB0665.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LRH 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/yZ0gaDba_PDMMkoyR4B18UUSceI>
Cc: IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IETF 96 IPsecME Agenda
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 19:09:22 -0000

On Thu, 7 Jul 2016, Waltermire, David A. (Fed) wrote:

>
> 10 minutes: agenda, WG status
>
> The following drafts are near done. Are the authors able to give a short status?
>
> 5 minutes: status of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ddos-protection-07 - Ready to send to the IESG?
> 5 minutes: status of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-09 - Ready for WGLC?
> 5 minutes: status of draft-ietf-ipsecme-safecurves-01 - Ready for WGLC?
>
> 20 minutes: discussion of draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-00 - Newly adopted. More discussion needed? Ready for WGLC?
>
> 30 minutes: discussion of draft-fluhrer-qr-ikev2-01 - The adoption call on draft-fluhrer-qr-ikev2-01 indicated strong interest in doing something in this space. We need to wrap up our adoption discussion and determine a path forward for WG activities in this space.
>
> 20 minutes: charter text review - The chairs will send out revised charter text before the meeting for review prior to discussion.
>
> This leaves 25 minutes extra. Are there any additional topics to discuss? ESP? Yang? Others?

There is draft-pauly-ipsecme-split-dns and draft-mglt-ipsecme-rfc7321bis
as well we could briefly talk about.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email