IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPsec] review draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-10.txt

Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 15 November 2023 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6884DC14CE38 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 09:53:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m9DhYHJCbPaN for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 09:53:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32453C14CEE3 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 09:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-280260db156so672757a91.2 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 09:53:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1700070782; x=1700675582; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Mh/jJBGsEtuMLdWVuUHWOWtLwUhk1K9rcyxgy1ktjtI=; b=M7j+ryIgu7EoGqbSQ8uVvngqH1BM1mRkoLf4apKPitK4i7tfPZ1UQJ72kBvbJplbX0 exAgjQd3OqwpD7Zex2VGa4AjMuy0y97dONaVG7kaNo/NwfqjbkRAb/H40A/AM/7Sk33v yWAAHW31d/A/TghrArVRr3XqpBrj+25o9AYMa/Y0tMtf8uYW6Koc10i/KYdd/DgCkA9t L+CL81xtX9ljLnMvp59kK7GMHJ2tVfab8KpJaH9g+mjxx3B4y4aNm1fpHaWJTfG78wdM YRaGr/MQVHtsC0hSeMxJWg7bLCIHpiO/dPhFORnv61w7v5RsmO5Qv28arPYBKVjEOW27 80zA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1700070782; x=1700675582; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Mh/jJBGsEtuMLdWVuUHWOWtLwUhk1K9rcyxgy1ktjtI=; b=f1ej2wqDmtEu5BsAVLi1cI9IzM20nyICvxkkGPyz/kaYbx19HJ1Vhw9GqDfXIhwgxC 9efU9sTPfVw0jGfOA4F2gHm6rGvr38jPRXehNs9b4s1qb63O2Ob2eaAhNQ97PiKVGH1f /XCZPSw4KilVHHLDs6scxyqWq9oa05eGtWB+BIpOUc9s4jkpeWy+kLtf+UMFHtv/wOOb XS9gR4SHGStHqs/tSzZSZqZiEu5jiGxoMK7xloBUz71MUR/YKVlfYQVitFTG70YvqoP2 VyRw525xjt2XjtWfcJEbi9mzsQ28O9UAFyePN004qzQ8IgJ3Fno3zFplnJXjWeGc1XTO Jfzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyADg7LgfBZK1oieRdoMXy4l9SNF5ZASJiMkvkBcRZXR1LZxfoO mvI9SrucfOyN0pLbLT4CGiKdmVTuhuDLWWtFndc1QOdFfu4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IErxnBE9z0kog8hwef8vFkj3YgfL41F3zjaZ3PuFqdGi4vveqVohN6/JIUO8OEkRNWP4ynRV/gGQpGusJBfh04=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3504:b0:274:4161:b9dc with SMTP id ls4-20020a17090b350400b002744161b9dcmr14644006pjb.31.1700070782088; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 09:53:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 12:52:51 -0500
Message-ID: <CADZyTknKzhWRfsxKoyX55QgRFo4T6N2n5nt8o7TVBvYLxUupQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0000000000000f9032060a3493fe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/TBruqpgn1ombs5GjNGIJ6ImK3Bk>
Subject: [IPsec] review draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-10.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 17:53:12 -0000

Hi,

I reviewed draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-10.txt and provides my comments in
the attached file. I am providing impressions as I was reading the text,
the authors are free to ignore them. I think the document is in good shape
and I tend to think we may send it to IESG in the coming future. The
beginning is quite hard but then it is pretty clear.

I am pretty sure I am using variations of the GCKS acronyms but it
represents the same entity ;-). I have not reviewed the appendix, sections
I might have to review are 4.5.3.  Member Key Bag Substructure 2.4.1.1.
GSA_REKEY Messages Authentication.



Yours,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email