Re: [IPsec] review draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-10.txt

Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 26 February 2024 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E70CC14F749 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 05:51:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OEk-ypzoGXYo for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 05:51:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2e.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF774C14F747 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 05:51:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2e.google.com with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-471e18cd6e3so189497137.3 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 05:51:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1708955488; x=1709560288; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tJheJWtgzAVZcbcVk1IVcmJ2nbV8auEt/C2hCwKm6d4=; b=Qld7W11dOe/XT6gcGpkWRxGApdcO70Kj4y0JD6+zGRL7zweadGdXdiw6XmOFqDwdZb adu4mnndLerwUhRrU0exPxx+eoKKxUyvHbH6J1wUKnh7p+pBjGPsPWbeeNlTkAmIjLWP ciJJYq5dXCkTf70VGg2rTCqwSNblkGys5vk5Ch2RKokUxGGUxzS5wLl45H5M6sZ6jpsT 3io8bi1L9KxIwJsXIa4thRdoFTWvE//oCcCD7NfwgVovgig/5isNoahtn5N/9MlbWkcM iRwVZOpAPVV4/y0DLk+EFZfoOxAVvAbaMnKBCMM8ZCeuD0m/IC7Sb223sgBTI+KqN/oc p9NQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708955488; x=1709560288; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=tJheJWtgzAVZcbcVk1IVcmJ2nbV8auEt/C2hCwKm6d4=; b=uJoAfGl+2yUi68tFQHR0LmpZurUgH35VMRG5fo6i5ke909xkefRMTIbhFym7W4Dmyg Pz947K9UJhiQjc0gK+2VUhF6UpbLgrKbTHnRutUIO/lcAfN2nG5V3OkJOp6rjs7+2/r8 nBVz4rzFP4bEPiy1krmRxheCNPxZRqCHWaqEu71yjRczpfRzcBrrDN6V3fmV6466HSoh Im/EEaPXUfD3/jgaC6SWU1hr0O/Ls1T6BnfKnhG7/2b+q7Ow2ir+dR5ZFHc3/bhfNi96 wCWW+kNkVqARRK85wQk/TXEkvxcMITqL430pWQINBhj6vMpHQWuI9mg2aGSMp3aaVxNd vBnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyit+D1y4Sel7Klkc1OOmMeauoLOajNXSia6haGZOX/U7aXVGos Qj51U0NVdObKZ606hszF62lSiZRnoe9vUfcKIO2ZB8Gq9cAiRsALdNCkKDE2pcigiev5HO/A0uy J6WZJou55unTSZIIcW+RdDFZo8EA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGfca50MeEYtthWHMTJ9xdgLkqTQAQPo/Pp1WgmD2NgBgdtsfIAquO7Y9xzZCv70ciYlBIY2YFr7w5UYq+9DmU=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f714:0:b0:470:3f14:f971 with SMTP id m20-20020a67f714000000b004703f14f971mr3103656vso.3.1708955487547; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 05:51:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADZyTknKzhWRfsxKoyX55QgRFo4T6N2n5nt8o7TVBvYLxUupQw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTknKzhWRfsxKoyX55QgRFo4T6N2n5nt8o7TVBvYLxUupQw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:51:16 +0300
Message-ID: <CAM85yVgY2NYxX+NOxYBh1UD5w0esp+GvDYErYd1W68_fsqGVPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000c5da33061249343a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/oytyW1tG8KKOZ8tPbAL_QqJR_vE>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] review draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-10.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:51:31 -0000

Hi Daniel,

Once again, thank you for your review and sorry for the terribly late
reply. Please see comments in the attached file (marked as <vs>).
The recently posted -11 version of the draft should address most of
the issues (if not all).

Regards,
Valery.

ср, 15 нояб. 2023 г. в 20:53, Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I reviewed draft-ietf-ipsecme-g-ikev2-10.txt and provides my comments in the attached file. I am providing impressions as I was reading the text, the authors are free to ignore them. I think the document is in good shape and I tend to think we may send it to IESG in the coming future. The beginning is quite hard but then it is pretty clear.
>
> I am pretty sure I am using variations of the GCKS acronyms but it represents the same entity ;-). I have not reviewed the appendix, sections I might have to review are 4.5.3.  Member Key Bag Substructure 2.4.1.1.  GSA_REKEY Messages Authentication.
>
>
>
> Yours,
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel Migault
> Ericsson
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec