Re: [IPsec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6311 (3615)
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 08 May 2013 15:12 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF26821F9223 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jZ-ukOWhUcNS for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598F021F9079 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2013 08:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-173.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r48FAnUD007960 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 8 May 2013 08:10:50 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130508130540.1AB75B1E004@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 08:10:49 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <425FD752-ED8E-4B3F-8E26-25A762F9563F@vpnc.org>
References: <20130508130540.1AB75B1E004@rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6311 (3615)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 15:12:16 -0000
This is a small editorial change, and should be accepted. The RFC Editor should add this change to its internal style guide for IPsec-related documents. --Paul Hoffman On May 8, 2013, at 6:05 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6311, > "Protocol Support for High Availability of IKEv2/IPsec". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6311&eid=3615 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> > > Section: 6.4 > > Original Text > ------------- > Note that this solution requires that either all Child SAs > use Extended Sequence Numbers (ESNs) or else that no Child SA uses > ESNs. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Note that this solution requires that either all Child SAs > use Extended Sequence Numbers (ESN) or else that no Child SA uses > ESN. > > Notes > ----- > "ESN" is used here as a name of a feature. There is no need to pluralize it. This is different from "SAs" or "SPIs", where there are many of each. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6311 (draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsecha-protocol-06) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Protocol Support for High Availability of IKEv2/IPsec > Publication Date : July 2011 > Author(s) : R. Singh, Ed., G. Kalyani, Y. Nir, Y. Sheffer, D. Zhang > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : IP Security Maintenance and Extensions > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > IPsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec >
- [IPsec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6311 (3615) RFC Errata System
- Re: [IPsec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6311 (… Paul Hoffman