IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis

"Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire@nist.gov> Mon, 09 January 2017 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F66129514 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 06:31:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nistgov.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uy8EBGYOTv2X for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 06:31:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gcc01-dm2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm2gcc01on0131.outbound.protection.outlook.com [23.103.201.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97D812950B for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 06:31:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nistgov.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nist-gov; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=KP0m5J7MclKOIqHj4BBT85c01Z3fnLjBlN4SOvgkFX0=; b=bbhXZCBQyRzqPVEObyciKuadFO/Qi/TbTLZ/ZQP/T32v4NAev3Ib12hgQuQAw7xdYjh1Yi5fFzbeklwk1xZPgAjsL4EQlKhIpnvczOH27Yys5RxkLqxFFZTYYAZuBlVrvM3+DFcW+d0NFTHcjmh785J8gmbvkbQpx4GqH5c9lq8=
Received: from BN6PR09MB1427.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.173.202.15) by BN6PR09MB1425.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.173.202.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.829.7; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:31:50 +0000
Received: from BN6PR09MB1427.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.202.15]) by BN6PR09MB1427.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.202.15]) with mapi id 15.01.0829.013; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:31:50 +0000
From: "Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, "paul@nohats.ca" <paul@nohats.ca>
Thread-Topic: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis
Thread-Index: AQHSUkrNg8o7s6UlrEiAEvxXPjoQEqEEoY6AgAZ0WQCAIQK7AIAAAX0AgAABTYCABEkuwA==
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 14:31:50 +0000
Message-ID: <BN6PR09MB1427FEFE4970F7DDB412AAD9F0640@BN6PR09MB1427.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAHbuEH4pqTK-kc65FVh98X-t+YsVe+9=J7_PjB8hESsY+5=-PQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1612121254150.14930@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAHbuEH4MgqDpWR_yc21Z8-HNU1Pvy8Hyz0NvW9qntwtxFuZmmw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbuEH7RROEheNbAJ9RpE+V8TiP1DYa92CbXEMQcas7wDUoYKg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1701061555210.2069@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAHbuEH46LQ=rk4aTqcbCa+=De5HPwbGBRQQOCzdV0tB0pz1wfw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH46LQ=rk4aTqcbCa+=De5HPwbGBRQQOCzdV0tB0pz1wfw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=david.waltermire@nist.gov;
x-originating-ip: [129.6.224.58]
x-ld-processed: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec,ExtAddr
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 243cd4c1-f54c-4207-5663-08d4389c3fe9
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:BN6PR09MB1425;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN6PR09MB1425; 7:gp97HieivQhBfbGElvn61BkHlwZTP+djQ4i7p+QooGE2CEChB3dEf3lTf5EINhmVvMtPwGAStZMtxJ9cH5ozrSh86HJURW9GRciIfwa32WOEVA0jMZlt9xbHULc1UlE9bqqRxFidO4uCdQiJRZFeZyre78zGDjPDPrKTWEMRjZqJJsaDASzdGdRbQpirm5JCMKJSBSZlYyy3dJmoYwGd3v16wypPVE90YLSV9fx1T4RL5bUv1FhNgBwGHyDQNVeYaY6zg/4UIAUneWl7ZnhpliyCqqkmJ2w3Mt3PSza2RWNA7DuMr9Kb/dQfPz+7DmZezK5brbMT2j0Kiu2VHDe92HZIOro6X0fkC4aaBsLSaTkCWQOo3e1AIhnIqy3Kf7XI7KnQP0mbkS6rWD7wFkWd0vB0YYzldUjTJGw2RtUkW8ieV+3cP3qLCWIGUb6UmTxt4bFmVbv2+Zi0XPIbWGEUrg==
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR09MB14257983656A134A89D2E8C9F0640@BN6PR09MB1425.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123560025)(20161123558021)(20161123555025)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(6072148); SRVR:BN6PR09MB1425; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN6PR09MB1425;
x-forefront-prvs: 0182DBBB05
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(7916002)(39450400003)(39410400002)(39850400002)(39840400002)(377454003)(199003)(189002)(24454002)(8936002)(54356999)(2501003)(106116001)(105586002)(122556002)(86362001)(6436002)(189998001)(106356001)(93886004)(55016002)(50986999)(76176999)(38730400001)(33656002)(39060400001)(99286003)(229853002)(3280700002)(4326007)(6506006)(77096006)(230783001)(6306002)(101416001)(2906002)(7736002)(68736007)(81156014)(102836003)(3660700001)(5660300001)(81166006)(2950100002)(790700001)(54896002)(6116002)(3846002)(25786008)(19609705001)(7696004)(97736004)(2900100001)(92566002)(74316002)(66066001)(5001770100001)(8676002)(9686003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR09MB1425; H:BN6PR09MB1427.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nist.gov does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN6PR09MB1427FEFE4970F7DDB412AAD9F0640BN6PR09MB1427namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Jan 2017 14:31:50.3052 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR09MB1425
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/WGbczzSUYSmAGC47252z7hoEWKg>
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 14:31:54 -0000

Kathleen,

I am just getting back after taking a long holiday. Sorry I was AFK on this one.

We want to advance rfc7321bis to go through the remainder of IESG review with 4307bis as a pair. Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to get this done before leaving on holiday. I need to do a WGLC on rfc7321bis starting ASAP this week. Can you hold 4307bis for a bit to have the two run concurrently?

Thanks,
Dave

From: IPsec [mailto:ipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kathleen Moriarty
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 4:01 PM
To: paul@nohats.ca
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis



On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca<mailto:paul@nohats.ca>> wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2017, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
I never got an answer as to whether or not I should wait on the last call, so I pushed it through.  No comments
came in during the holiday period.  Should last call be extended?  Or does the WG feel the reason was because the
document is ready?  If the latter then I'll get it ready for an IESG telechat.  I'd prefer to put it on 2/2/2017
as there are already a fair number of documents on the telechat in 2 weeks.

If you schedule it for 2/2 then I guess we can give people another two
weeks for comments? Although I'm not sure if that means we will get
more comments :)
I'm not sure we'll get more either.  Is 2/2 okay or is there any rush for this draft?

Thanks!


Paul



--

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email