Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis
Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 27 February 2017 20:55 UTC
Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757A912A328; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:55:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lsQxvRy7lIWQ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:55:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AC8512A31A; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:55:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id n127so117473003qkf.0; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:55:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oGFYizl//dYnfHkFd7E3XxNJKIEg+DVtI8kqdkbSQaU=; b=ijr6CpGoROHSYtBjRtrQwqjNWvNhZTPNA36uX86KFulUiQIc/v8TsErvr1mb//8WgD lSX5irgcpi8rsaTpURcRLVFJ8R6OlX6R2Xk75khk79bNKXR4qE0e7W1iPbQBbwhEC65H ArtPF2qIMqk9TrJyxv4+ZbQmuRFH/0zKUVSWBanynz7y4R0UhdO7qSklCghkpYxUCqJr DG11MSTUrE6uv17KrGrPvo6CCtc61ZOTcpHL2q+dU1C/L2jpFEfZv8gj+N3mRgkYNacY +HxLwHHu1Ot6Joo2MLzE7Uugn6/XWXDjaLz4KjQLjd1J4WvYWfHJtczsCYS91bd5Yd/n JByw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oGFYizl//dYnfHkFd7E3XxNJKIEg+DVtI8kqdkbSQaU=; b=JlaoAyqjGp/3JvWpThau1D+S1Tour1uJ0FFmY9bQB4BWRg+rEo+RDKt/wlrq9+gXvK Gxs7fV100wjzAUe+JHdf1Pwx+JnyzoZ70nUw0iB2H0Vl25+7QNfj1EQnonASrqg+yQH1 fNOiXQ0Oe8xmiQ1pF2bXXoH7P9KD5i9xnQaw1/I1umWRbdEm+Y8zxz/AK/DZZrmv0OY7 MAsp0sMoS7hQxuw6XSeD5uiIbxzjQXgbFhv5iAN4LlZ7pibfhMzQUHs6O/W6ZiBV7ZyK +zWekdSLAvofSzE+jAwaGGwO8U+ncpfvLPm1Fuw/T2laRRTspG5ezIqFPxPoWvfDBwzY WbxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nntr1Pw2s/f3htJUlUhaUtLhV0s8d1kXJswAYxL0gLRP4yKSViir0Bzexxo8X3U6FCdtt3sISFBdPcEQ==
X-Received: by 10.200.39.130 with SMTP id w2mr17488756qtw.280.1488228913446; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:55:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.140.78 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:55:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1702271429530.23426@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CAHbuEH4K1MW8BitnOtmpoHwU6ZseqwNkYQTJ_YUE6cYxH9cshg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1702171211350.17106@bofh.nohats.ca> <CAHbuEH4f_67DKywJNL=POTu-dF8Ewb7T0aYO6U=uxAd6ocxGKA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1702211120080.3603@bofh.nohats.ca> <22701.42500.198298.440746@fireball.acr.fi> <CAHbuEH7sZCGAJPP=97LAAfLhY+HxSj6V7KCty-T45YTmR-+Dyw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbuEH6KMMEDLkzJeGw69LAJ+yY1+YUDDdXAhvMWhpPXTdqjbA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1702271429530.23426@bofh.nohats.ca>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:55:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH6_L4+qsiUDq8TPck2jnBqGvsOAfA2RhdtLVd02NNCP9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/aHhd_yvO9ylfW3ezW5J4-1lTjUg>
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis@ietf.org, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:55:15 -0000
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: > >>> I think that may help head off questions in last call and IESG review >>> if anyone else looks back at 7321. >> >> >> Is there any chance this update could happen today so I can start last >> call? I'd like ot keep this on the 3/16 telechat with the other >> IPsecme draft if possible. > > > Yes, I'll push out an update today that includes what Tero and I said to > replace that one liner you pointed at. Great, thank you! > > Paul -- Best regards, Kathleen
- [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc73… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc73… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc73… Paul Wouters
- [IPsec] Regarding max limit of payloads to avoid … Sandeep Kampati
- [IPsec] Regarding max limit of payloads to avoid … Tero Kivinen
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc73… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc73… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc73… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc73… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc73… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc73… Waltermire, David A. (Fed)