Re: [IPsec] #123: Proposal to remove the IANA tables from IKEv2bis

Hi Paul,

Please add to Issue #123 a list of the affected tables. For example, I wouldn't imagine the list of notification types moving away, even though it's already been extended by IANA. Similarly for the stuff in Sec. 3.6, which is strongly related to descriptive text.

Thanks,
	Yaron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Steven Bellovin
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 5:20
> To: Paul Hoffman
> Cc: ipsec@ietf.org; Dan McDonald
> Subject: Re: [IPsec] #123: Proposal to remove the IANA tables from
> IKEv2bis
> 
> 
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > I *really* don't think it is that hard for a developer to resolve a URL
> and read the tables there.
> 
> 
> Leave out the table; give the URL and mention 4306.  If you have two more-
> or-less authoritative sources for the same information, some folks will
> use one and some the other.  Point to the URL as *the* source, and say
> that it subsumes all values given in 4306.
> 
> 		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
> 
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.