Re: [IPsec] #123: Proposal to remove the IANA tables from IKEv2bis

Dan McDonald <danmcd@sun.com> Tue, 24 November 2009 01:37 UTC

Return-Path: <danmcd@sun.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39023A6ADC for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:37:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.046
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.046 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qlv8KThIB-EU for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:37:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com (brmea-mail-4.Sun.COM [192.18.98.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30F33A6AAC for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id nAO1bXxd002627 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:37:34 GMT
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) id <0KTL00B00B3D8700@mail-amer.sun.com> for ipsec@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:37:33 -0700 (MST)
Received: from @ ([unknown] [71.174.113.16]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.04 64bit (built Jul 2 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KTL00C3IB6KDQ80@mail-amer.sun.com> for ipsec@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:37:33 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:37:32 -0500
From: Dan McDonald <danmcd@sun.com>
In-reply-to: <p0624084fc730e6cf0252@[10.20.30.158]>
Sender: Dan.McDonald@sun.com
To: ipsec@ietf.org
Message-id: <20091124013732.GD3457@mactavish>
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Solaris Networking & Security
References: <p06240847c730db1c447f@[10.20.30.158]> <20091124011228.GC3457@mactavish> <p0624084fc730e6cf0252@[10.20.30.158]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Subject: Re: [IPsec] #123: Proposal to remove the IANA tables from IKEv2bis
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:37:38 -0000

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 05:27:36PM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> >Can you move 'em to an appendix, with a permanent URL reference to the IANA
> >up-to-date versions?
> 
> As long as you mean "an appendix that clearly says 'these were in RFC 4306
> but are now out-of-date but are here just for reference and you want to
> look at <URL>'", I'm OK with that as well.

I'd actually go one better -- snapshot what's on IANA today (or the day
before RFC-editor pulls the switch) with the warning you quote ('... just
for reference and you want to look at <URL>').  The warning and URL is the
critical part.

Dan