[IPsec] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-ah-reqts

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 25 February 2014 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9E01A0735 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:48:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.101
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6DYDHwNd1PXD for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:48:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F079B1A072E for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:48:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hi5so4734398wib.3 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:48:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zO+T6+ghhTYIPkxEhQ1nzP6kNTfAmEvMuMhRdjrsA5k=; b=MrsIDHD/qOHbkDZGIMgXX0hZUGuAeVPCeLFiOb2e6zGdg4IQy5Blcfa7Il9Ip4VMrE j88cLh5UubWsTE1nwDagqFKoV2SLsCxokwbIWBp9CLFL27U2wC572M6tFE9JQFvyMe1D 6y5T2wnnbnIgrJ5WoZo7v9iF7B66NLCrTjtdIkak37UiSzWua1msfhJuun/9sdzCGXfF dKciGlme2V3o76oKyut1KLXkQreTk4Pn6R02fvG2a8POPhgekAfJ3l2iRvxmt0hP+yrj 9TyfHoQPYvQ+t9jTt4d31CKDI0Ary1oJpkEd/SzJ/RhRG9jDUZQaiiiImalgLECQE81H 3unQ==
X-Received: by with SMTP id yz2mr25955395wjc.18.1393354116664; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:48:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] (bzq-79-177-80-210.red.bezeqint.net. []) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u6sm2621713wif.6.2014. for <ipsec@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:48:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <530CE583.6030801@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:48:35 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipsec <ipsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/i9xUH9OFp16CfKWSzpz67P3R14k
Subject: [IPsec] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-ah-reqts
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:48:41 -0000

Hi, this is to start a 2-week working group last call on the revised 
Algorithm Implementation Requirements document, ending March 11. The 
draft is at: 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-ah-reqts-01. We should 
have last called the draft a while ago, and I apologize for the delay.

The changes from the existing requirements are listed in Sec. 2.5 of the 
draft, but most of this (rather short) document is new and describes the 
rationale for the choice of algorithms and requirement levels.

Please read this draft and send any comments to the WG mailing list, 
even if the comments are "I see no problems". Comments such as "I do not 
understand this part" or "this part could be explained better in this 
way" are particularly useful at this point.