Re: [IPsec] New PAKE Criteria draft posted

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 25 March 2010 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0653A6B65 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Ewy5grE5cYb for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com (mail-fx0-f213.google.com [209.85.220.213]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC6E3A6DAA for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so1293756fxm.29 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xv0+EKWUVF9MiArkcosApfveUM5HcTOC1s8XjaMOWfE=; b=mwhuC45Wxyihsa60WRtxfjKKj5YODDYBa4rqPcaQRw9i10t91tA8IDdhgTZpfkszfJ arvWpn+MxXXzUpGKY9cywGHUU3NwqnFlKrH5EjG+u/aYLbn3lpXrDeS8AGuDE6fXqCwD UYUe7nBo3EzBmk4hETZnr6j6OqyePfyf5eAi0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZjIta+qoMz/598E6C1KzS/1rE+nj4Y1CbsNPJpVm1wp47uDduP7o2gQsL+B2bv+I2n a6RTXQ3Ef3D9MVf0wc/1DPQuvZFgiZ22NQ9y7zmSDZ4ZhtnP+dZwWmSqqKHgJXBFaGfY DLteJQWvBAY59QtU0GE44bIRMOkf5Xc33hpJE=
Received: by 10.87.2.15 with SMTP id e15mr87266fgi.23.1269541795085; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.1] (bzq-79-183-28-63.red.bezeqint.net [79.183.28.63]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm74193fge.23.2010.03.25.11.29.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BABABAE.5050501@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:30:06 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SeongHan Shin <seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp>
References: <4BAB06D4.3030907@gmail.com> <a8d6c01a1003251107x7cc6e303g5e105f547788a58e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a8d6c01a1003251107x7cc6e303g5e105f547788a58e@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>, Kazukuni Kobara <k-kobara@aist.go.jp>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] New PAKE Criteria draft posted
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:31:46 -0000

Hi Shin,

Yes. For the typical remote access VPN, EAP is typically more useful. 
Note that there is still need for strong password-based mutual 
authentication EAP methods - but their home is the EMU working group.

In addition, the IPsecME has another charter item designed to fit such 
EAP methods (such as the future EAP-AugPAKE :-) into IKEv2.

Please see again the group's charter, 
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ipsecme/charters.

Thanks,
	Yaron

On 25.3.2010 20:07, SeongHan Shin wrote:
> Dear Yaron Sheffer,
>
> I have one question about the draft.
>
> draft-sheffer-ipsecme-pake-criteria-02.txt says in Page 4
> “This document is limited to the use of password-based authentication to
> achieve trust between gateways”
>
> Is this a consensus of this WG?
>
> Best regards,
> Shin
>
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com
> <mailto:yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     after the good discussion in Anaheim, and with the help of comments
>     received on and off the list, I have updated the PAKE Criteria draft
>     and posted it as
>     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sheffer-ipsecme-pake-criteria-02.txt.
>
>     I have added a number of criteria, clarified others, and added
>     numbering (SEC1-SEC6, IPR1-IPR3 etc.).
>
>     Thanks,
>         Yaron
>     _______________________________________________
>     IPsec mailing list
>     IPsec@ietf.org <mailto:IPsec@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> SeongHan Shin
> Research Center for Information Security (RCIS),
> National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST),
> Room no. 1003, Akihabara Daibiru 10F,
> 1-18-13, Sotokannda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-0021 Japan
> Tel : +81-3-5298-2722
> Fax : +81-3-5298-4522
> E-mail : seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp <mailto:seonghan.shin@aist.go.jp>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------