Re: [IPsec] WESP

Gregory,

Do you see how WESP can be used in KARP?

Jack

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Gregory Lebovitz
<gregory.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> inline...
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> wrote:
> --snip--
>
>>
>> I am not suggesting that any aspect of your analysis is flawed. I am
>> suggesting that before the WG chooses to further deprecate AH, it needs to
>> document the analysis supporting this decision, not just cite a couple of
>> examples and make general statements in support of such an action.
>
> WESP implementations need to occur, be deployed, and have some time in
> operational networks. It would benefit the standards process to get some
> feedback from the operational community once this has happened. Whether or
> not we call it "experimental", we need to try out the WESP mechanism, in
> parallel with the heuristics method, in the wild and see what comes of
> them.
> We need not be shy about WESP's existence and benefits. I agree we ought to
> go on a bit of an intra-IETF "road show" and get the word to other Areas and
> WG's about WESP as compared to AH, and see what feedback we get. This can
> only help the standards process. In this context, Steve's suggestion for a
> an analysis document would be very helpful. Much of the arguments made in
> this thread would be excellently housed in said document.
> After some time in the wild, If we observe signs that WESP is operationally
> replacing AH, then we could seriously discuss deprecating AH.
> HTH,
> Gregory.
>
>>
>> Steve
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPsec mailing list
>> IPsec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>
>
>
> --
> ----
> IETF related email from
> Gregory M. Lebovitz
> Juniper Networks
>

Re: [IPsec] WESP - Roadmap Ahead