Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-12.txt

Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> Tue, 09 November 2021 04:07 UTC

Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15DC3A0C9C for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:07:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4WHvrS3bN2Wz for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:07:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.chopps.org (smtp.chopps.org [54.88.81.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25B03A0CA0 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 20:07:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ja.int.chopps.org.chopps.org (047-026-251-217.res.spectrum.com [47.26.251.217]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp.chopps.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EFDF80394; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 04:07:33 +0000 (UTC)
References: <163637838640.2334.12779298707748449055@ietfa.amsl.com> <6924f7c3-5d95-ab58-ab76-94caf814e287@nohats.ca>
User-agent: mu4e 1.6.6; emacs 27.2
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
To: Paul Wouters <paul.wouters=40aiven.io@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 23:02:32 -0500
In-reply-to: <6924f7c3-5d95-ab58-ab76-94caf814e287@nohats.ca>
Message-ID: <m2tugmottm.fsf@ja.int.chopps.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/tHjgFFE_R4ljlUqSCOsvxa7Rsos>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-12.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 04:07:40 -0000

Paul Wouters <paul.wouters=40aiven.io@dmarc.ietf.org> writes:

> On Mon, 8 Nov 2021, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-12.txt
>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-12
>
> Looks good to me other than a typo:  s/the they fall/they fall/
>
> (but we can let the RFC editor fix that one without issuing a new draft)

Thanks, I've made the update locally to keep track of it as well.

Also, Yoav flagged "is comprised of" to me off-list, so I locally changed those to "consists of". There's a subgroup of language experts that really don't like people to use "is comprised of". :)

Thanks,
Chris.

>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec