Re: Vendors who are implementing IPSEC, step forward....

Saroop Mathur <saroop@cylan.com> Fri, 05 September 1997 19:32 UTC

Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id PAA01159 for ipsec-outgoing; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 15:32:26 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <34106103.19E0@cylan.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 1997 12:44:53 -0700
From: Saroop Mathur <saroop@cylan.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
CC: ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: Vendors who are implementing IPSEC, step forward....
References: <199709041825.OAA03760@dcl.MIT.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk

CyLAN Technologies licenses IPSEC and ISAKMP/Oakley toolkits for
embedded systems.

- Saroop Mathur


Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> 
> Hi there,
> 
>         I'm starting to get reporters who are pestering me for
> interviews; one of the questions which they are asking is "which
> companies are implementing IPSEC"?  In the spirit of fairness, I'd
> appreciate if people from those vendors who are willing to have their
> names on the list of "companies who are planning to implement IPSEC",
> send me e-mail.
> 
>         I could make some inferences based on who's active on the ipsec
> mailing list, which is after all public, but it seems fairer to ask
> people to self-nominate themselves for this list, so that I don't miss
> anyone or appear to be playing favorites with respect to
> marketing/pushing certain companies or their products more than others.
> 
>         Of course, if you'd rather not be listed, that's fine too!
> 
>                                                 - Ted