IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC4941bis implementations

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Sun, 05 April 2020 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5163A08BA; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vjmQ7eHdtyja; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x644.google.com (mail-pl1-x644.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::644]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 980EC3A08B8; Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x644.google.com with SMTP id g2so5034833plo.3; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 12:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=7cUN8cgrhKfwMQZ2EqN4B0tQoUb3yp04fbeinq4RaZw=; b=JhcCZouX2BouMXrbt9kabjQ+8AQ656QLMlednNktDo+6YRYt1GHMbZn1LoYHmOakPv ZO/4eDQ6fpsbmmU7LlXMcbBKs6iWQPShpZwyQTPM9n03rJhbUAxT3vWoyj/cFIP4KFXF g1bvdIbdwPuf/ctI5fbTlawJl/xm5YOdcFF+JgRvHqV60Juk3XBc0Yu666owJPLmoS4z Jt+YxoijtWYOfgW8QSwUOjyqw8JuIWiwsiA/zZ0SdJPZUHS30nJ0EO5acOL5wbXSLIdl rRAkjIoZLM6RP/974l/iHc/aSm2i/CipyMsMuH45lK31nf2ioyqUu0NMlAAeK+a5/Va1 CyeQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=7cUN8cgrhKfwMQZ2EqN4B0tQoUb3yp04fbeinq4RaZw=; b=Bb9Q4soLss1alG5mr5DNxIGKBIq3wc0sVVgDRKUsHnNpkfMwpnaISy/ilKYu4yxi4x TLGgzB8ie+TAQaxm6vCU+bMdG1LUc1U3VaFgdqV7QwESgxm+jcpuOAxleFxb7dM+Xo1A Jlzpp/TksrghguPohKaF7wrJCEH4s2JEfxp6x4RbyfBeGPZ8kE8FZuGbYGMDR/Pm5Tkv FESmoAOpgojZmqkgxDe9But6CUisWWnyUPaAIzqnNcZ0rzQz0W2H3RCfA1wL299XOfdK aHpZMyAoO8Cr0r8k+sWziph4QeOPPzLpiqufrn4teCa6k2Kl6xsfKAcMKXDvwehN9s0I ODPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYxe+5J4vASr8mQ1oj4PiUn86ypsc23ZSFtZ4CPMqOOg4tTfgGJ Dc3ltEKAr1GO7zWf9KmJ0vGirIrpMhg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypInlfDIpkiIho9C0885kNhTBzCfn/3lAe83DLzDlj2uhq+kWe9gAwZ1NQZEHO+bOn7qZtOkhA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:224e:: with SMTP id c72mr22319109pje.175.1586114775396; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 12:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5a00:ef0b:9d81:1923:bbc3:9b16? ([2601:647:5a00:ef0b:9d81:1923:bbc3:9b16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w138sm10191155pff.145.2020.04.05.12.26.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Apr 2020 12:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <22A4454F-BAF7-46D1-9715-A0C6A5174AA6@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6DE475A1-7EFB-4B00-B4A4-63D58999D4AC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Subject: Re: RFC4941bis implementations
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 12:26:13 -0700
In-Reply-To: <3255dcf9-be71-bd68-fb6c-9b6bc0f99a58@si6networks.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, "6man-chairs@ietf.org" <6man-chairs@ietf.org>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
References: <7d65f86a-7a82-6139-b455-a27046496c52@si6networks.com> <F195E17C-4F5B-47E3-9BA4-FAD966C997F1@gmail.com> <3255dcf9-be71-bd68-fb6c-9b6bc0f99a58@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/1JmltGNMZVo54r9uH2s22cmgbTw>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 19:26:20 -0000

Fernando,

> On Apr 2, 2020, at 12:45 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello, Suresh,
> 
> [....]
>>> 
>>> FWIW, I produce a patch for Linux kernel (net-next) that implements rfc4941bis: https://www.gont.com.ar/code/fgont-patch-linux-net-next-rfc4941bis.txt (up & running here).
>>> 
>>> I've submitted it to the netdev list already.
>>> 
>>> And should have a patch for the FreeBSD kernel today.
>>> 
>>> Not sure if this might be useful for a "disposable" (to be removed by the RFC-Ed section), but I guess might be of use for the shepherd's writeup?
>> I think you can add an Implementation Status section into the draft as described in RFC7942. It serves as documentation of the existing implementations when the draft goes through IETF Last Call as well as IESG Evaluation. It will be removed before the draft is published as an RFC. I have found these sections helpful and informative when I was on the IESG.
> 
> Thanks a lot for your input! Will do that, unless the chairs suggest otherwise.

I think that is fine.

Bob


> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Cheers,
> --
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
> 
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email