Re: RFC4941bis implementations

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Fri, 03 April 2020 02:41 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD363A0C9B; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 19:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ia1YytnUD8FS; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 19:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CC2C3A0C9F; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 19:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] (unknown [181.45.84.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E89A0831C7; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 04:41:26 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: RFC4941bis implementations
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, "6man-chairs@ietf.org" <6man-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <7d65f86a-7a82-6139-b455-a27046496c52@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr36wesZWLe6uKnhwbeMm6mm6zPN=Ob3R-nkT6AVZO52fg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <c036c538-cfd3-5817-d9da-8f2c2d2a45ac@si6networks.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 23:41:12 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr36wesZWLe6uKnhwbeMm6mm6zPN=Ob3R-nkT6AVZO52fg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/HLwMhQe4Q189GUnRURkMPrNf850>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 02:41:38 -0000

On 2/4/20 23:14, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 2:28 AM Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com 
> <mailto:fgont@si6networks.com>> wrote:
> 
>     FWIW, I produce a patch for Linux kernel (net-next) that implements
>     rfc4941bis:
>     https://www.gont.com.ar/code/fgont-patch-linux-net-next-rfc4941bis.txt
>     (up & running here).
> 
>     I've submitted it to the netdev list already.
> 
> 
> Do you have a link to the patch on patchwork?

I've put it online here, just in case: 
https://www.gont.com.ar/code/fgont-patch-linux-net-next-rfc4941bis.txt

And this was my post to netdev: 
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/e8eb613d-3967-3bf3-209c-630017c7f304@si6networks.com/T/#u

(the resulting code is much simpler. MOre lines of code deleted than added).

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492