IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC4941bis implementations

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Thu, 02 April 2020 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C64C3A109E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 12:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XF8dUpPzxPOr for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 12:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 525A23A109D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 12:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] (unknown [181.45.84.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C74DB893A4; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 21:39:27 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: RFC4941bis implementations
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, ipv6@ietf.org
References: <7d65f86a-7a82-6139-b455-a27046496c52@si6networks.com> <af621915-ad9d-eb89-01d7-6ec7c5dfdd5e@gmail.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Message-ID: <20c47838-8c66-8380-d3b2-5f48a787c8a9@gont.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 16:21:04 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <af621915-ad9d-eb89-01d7-6ec7c5dfdd5e@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/kyvgmgHgIAwlSn8imv4gjAiYMgc>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 19:39:33 -0000

On 2/4/20 16:09, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> Le 02/04/2020 à 19:26, Fernando Gont a écrit :
>> Folks,
>>
>> FWIW, I produce a patch for Linux kernel (net-next) that implements 
>> rfc4941bis: 
>> https://www.gont.com.ar/code/fgont-patch-linux-net-next-rfc4941bis.txt 
>> (up & running here).
> 
> Does it work with a plen 65 in RA?

No. Why would that matter in this context?


-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email