IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-naveen-slaac-prefix-management-00.txt

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Sun, 25 November 2018 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09EF129BBF; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 22:15:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fEUSnfFDfb97; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 22:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B054F123FFD; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 22:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id E290CB8; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 07:15:23 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1543126523; bh=JSmEKbYW7NRIxKOtNvkXc1QFZTyhbfttXXhsY2JkLUY=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FfFcx14XoNgwCFLPFmYq84t6W0hs9RwPyV6xxtUGVgR9BgQzJyGON9DwDekHJXTAF UN5FmGlttA0HTvbwKzuJ7leWhUaf9yK/W+/AlDCavT1Qg1kGf53pfw0sLT4G6rC6Bu t8WUV8A0Rfjd/RNTYSZ7wpaVDoNPeOtz8LL8XLO4=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD65AB6; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 07:15:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 07:15:23 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-naveen-slaac-prefix-management-00.txt
In-Reply-To: <7bbb7a430084407f801d0becaaa2906d@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811250713500.14216@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <154155148848.30897.17784898234776136208.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <430c94b29f3a49bd9fed24d8d78c6624@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811211109340.14216@uplift.swm.pp.se> <7ba4a7429e374385856002e361e0324e@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811211708220.14216@uplift.swm.pp.se> <51084397aa90410684c599a2cb1953d0@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811211724550.14216@uplift.swm.pp.se> <275c824aec1c46c9a4fd4775e97fa127@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811211903140.14216@uplift.swm.pp.se> <ccb7ae3b97c8430eb2422b2ed3c4505c@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811211920230.14216@uplift.swm.pp.se> <0f1eab2127ce49d2a7f3da56b053c741@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <0c56d7eb-e7a3-0640-9612-176c595897d0@gmail.com> <b8b6689d2cfe4985bfb8634661890674@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811220617270.14216@uplift.swm.pp.se> <7bbb7a430084407f801d0becaaa2906d@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/1K9YdQPDx_NfYzxAvSo1l77AeYE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 06:15:30 -0000

On Sat, 24 Nov 2018, Templin (US), Fred L wrote:

> Do you think we should bring back RAAN?

Yes, but also note that the relay behavior is my least concern with the 
DHCP+RA combination. The ships in the night problem between leasetimers 
(DHCP) and lifetimes (RA) is a much bigger concern for me.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email