Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-naveen-slaac-prefix-management-00.txt

Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com> Thu, 22 November 2018 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B6D130E93; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 18:36:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q8SfjUYsMXOW; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 18:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B707C126CC7; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 18:36:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id n18so5438066lfh.6; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 18:36:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yrG/C3EqA98j9Lcuq9fMj/QamBRSUdVv41bLM97hQ9w=; b=l9dadrlEHu4BiR5kyTiq4w44Un3FNv6adV+i6tON6yXLo82AGHyt4jZI7C0C+7UI+S 7XcV59cBm1Lu0ZNKtQt/UtYuLxLiiNxKufVmlY/F7Z4WoND/wjgxB1ccgBDxbCfachrr zApt790Kh8r4RFeKBGnpnhoGp3hlB+qjxrKSBCUZwBo3sXjAtUVVLTtK/+EviUprVwZy VPGJ29mRaGPaNRFtbGdhIGpdtRO2SDgEAwySf+lsyp5KhMrQG/qWxvsfmcQyV2J7yr0C S+r3v9uWQSZkFweHFPTFJl4rXdu+cRwgt1L82eR/NYswfLIsEnPyVWJFyM5g4ujHE86o Bpqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yrG/C3EqA98j9Lcuq9fMj/QamBRSUdVv41bLM97hQ9w=; b=Q/O0/DJWARC/lC+fmJMtgZA9X+ppupc27odOGwLU5OeTzkvWnsR5+A5QfYLUTDrPPV ezC0G/ca3E+3ixbCdM92sA/OzJiN+Ve6xnjGVcCiZk1NYdvCkht/ApoKLDHonb1M3/Cm vI382lcTNgdpN3dkSmZv3LG66eRObLAAYeVfzPt4U0eCrY5/N7He1XJnK+DHxmzW+nyw u084te53GXgx9s80MZNXEZwlqW9mGmLIFEAlXiNx2px//ZhR7Ru0ZxNN0luID2FQhiFJ 7/XbbyxXw9NUfuQKE5mUWxpLaHaAVlzlhyoxiq8+rBSh3luZUE8JISpNa+eRoMjiBwdO 5K1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gKXZlNN2JO62d5e45muROWbXetymGg1TAUksEkF2Alp71Np7asw pOQQdsmBBJPte1LSuWPJ0CdoNp9KOfZ7hUIi8xg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5efjz6fGFMkhVc+QY/TobYd31+1tVKtwZXItUup24V3O1nmv+4bJVC+OkOq2KPhnIdbX2bfUjiYQQTjbUAEqNg=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:d857:: with SMTP id p84mr5131557lfg.44.1542854203850; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 18:36:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <154155148848.30897.17784898234776136208.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <a446f89d19954278a8ff09ac9850acd7@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <90b22d50-6100-a45c-1663-da80fede8126@gmail.com> <8d3cab11459e4276825c644154fd1b0e@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <c31171cd-8de1-d613-60fb-7b4c5d63c831@gmail.com> <CANFmOtmpNjxfpPF-2JL1QMEo2Dkh1owpVtgRxWtgve8-SmxT2A@mail.gmail.com> <7cfcb7b21b1f498e880d00d11b0adfad@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <79f505f6-94e6-4570-0e77-d21e0d7c77e1@gmail.com> <CANFmOtmu6jsSx6z3mZRTkM95D-c6i=D7OJTDKgYCuA76-N9qXQ@mail.gmail.com> <995ff903-1df6-225a-8aaa-813db45d1dd2@gmail.com> <CANFmOt=VYMgPTL1SH6hsBCDEtZBAL9v_1k5a2QW0M7A-TRaXPA@mail.gmail.com> <50c10934-6ca8-00d0-73bd-cc6cf19ed213@gmail.com> <CANFmOt=DSi0Y=jBoNJFtFaJHDzFJ+61ZAN0L2a94efnfMBMh1w@mail.gmail.com> <57b98143-1db3-9fcb-6d2b-4a0937ec00c9@gmail.com> <CANFmOtkDWQ83ZwBkXo8umhFzDfdWO+dXv4uR1ErrEpbND8AWmA@mail.gmail.com> <aa2885ee3fc844beb1df37ad6ff44dff@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <68b85f05-b76c-df73-5f91-2de4853779ac@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <68b85f05-b76c-df73-5f91-2de4853779ac@gmail.com>
From: Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 08:06:36 +0530
Message-ID: <CANFmOtmF-QnPS_=fNa1vU59nGLXxBOdAQjUoEaf3cUp0DbQHCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-naveen-slaac-prefix-management-00.txt
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c2c65c057b37bc9e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/AmW0cFcGydhcsjZZAWT8mIgFATM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 02:36:48 -0000

Hello,

Is there a case where a CPE would require a prefix > 64 bit?

Thanks & Regards,
Naveen

On Thu, 22 Nov 2018, 01:22 Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com
wrote:

> On 2018-11-22 03:56, Templin (US), Fred L wrote:
> > I think any prefix delegation service needs to allow for any legitimate
> prefix
> > length of /64 or shorter.
>
> Or longer. Routing prefixes in IPv6 can be any length up to /128.
> Without regard to the whole "Why /64?" debate, we must ensure that
> all prefix mechanisms are agnostic on the actual prefix length.
>
>    Brian
>