Re: [6man] Stable privacy addresses (upcoming rev)

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 03 April 2012 07:37 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FDA21F852B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 00:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NsajNyNVWBnI for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 00:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C51521F855B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 00:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=461; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1333438661; x=1334648261; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YN51Qk/0N2J1wdE2w+gyQpD9/42bBSljpX+4uRn0t8Q=; b=buezdxy51AS1Q3+n5tBpzubMpe6Xdgc602WLxLHEOXvvaMNs0/KYPe8z 581G9es1cmeJAIJz1WBDKemkcMAJcAFUIQLLHXU3i2u3114sVv0rGreEV aLbA0K1CKAFd55bVBAwD0TqyCF5gIvzjxYftOqIvt6HMQ/5nnqVDLoiKr s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAI2oek+Q/khR/2dsb2JhbABCuAaBB4IJAQEBAwESARQTPwULCw44VwY1h2IFoCuXIJALYwSVYYVwiFeBaIJo
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,362,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="134104378"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.72.81]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2012 07:37:22 +0000
Received: from Freds-Computer.local (dhcp-10-55-88-88.cisco.com [10.55.88.88]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q337bL74016961; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 07:37:22 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by Freds-Computer.local (PGP Universal service); Tue, 03 Apr 2012 08:37:22 +0100
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Freds-Computer.local on Tue, 03 Apr 2012 08:37:22 +0100
Subject: Re: [6man] Stable privacy addresses (upcoming rev)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F761589.7090800@si6networks.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:37:11 +0100
Message-Id: <9266DEAD-848B-4577-AF33-B4A34B049458@cisco.com>
References: <4F7333F9.9090007@si6networks.com> <4F75AF50.5000308@globis.net> <4F760DC9.8090109@gmail.com> <4F761589.7090800@si6networks.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 07:37:42 -0000

On Mar 30, 2012, at 9:20 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:

> If the regime controls the local-link, then as far as address-tracking is concerned, you're toast. -- They could sniff the network and log the address->MAC mappings, have RAs require you to do DHCPv6 and then have DHCPv6 assign you a constant address, etc.

If they don't control the link, they can (as I'm told the Netherlands does) require a daily upload of who used what address when.