IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-prefix-03

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 02 June 2013 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C75B21F9104; Sun, 2 Jun 2013 13:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.176
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.176 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ERV4epAEl+82; Sun, 2 Jun 2013 13:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ye0-f169.google.com (mail-ye0-f169.google.com [209.85.213.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578EA21F901F; Sun, 2 Jun 2013 13:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ye0-f169.google.com with SMTP id m9so921031yen.14 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 02 Jun 2013 13:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to; bh=hT4KdSBjsDXNqEoYwUGfKiuzRoznovZrzIwKmtzIHU4=; b=udCakXAsQ+ImQrni8i8jaLNR1Hpvio2EMzd1QD30VPH17vnHbfA8c9hTCPkx4p9EB7 4L1DPHI+fiopWF7zIAZxHgY19qiGBJdFsNc2uvhaKbWDo94XxH6HXVhchhbHOAf8gJJd 3fjAKW4eyQYQEXFrBuf2lIhse7dpVwZWUauUiDRcn+j7AxKWDxOfCdD1MM4I2oXtuKKH 6rGA8bWQd8NAcX5SxyaNz4AZU55pf+X1PkjX582FhxMFqpwSMFxMY77jJ8vlFji5k+zi P9c8KwuXpZmuFgfl7V29ChoR+vzhBZmhmxWxKQK0w9jjp+/fSPMVs3e4gk4hQETwIeNP hHQQ==
X-Received: by 10.236.51.230 with SMTP id b66mr5410230yhc.116.1370206040871; Sun, 02 Jun 2013 13:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.12.7.85] (mobile-198-228-196-228.mycingular.net. [198.228.196.228]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m74sm87239925yhm.0.2013.06.02.13.47.18 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 02 Jun 2013 13:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AC98DAE@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <03680813-07D9-459B-A229-FA974C9A4B9E@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <8E492087-390E-4F8E-8078-1D0E63849243@delong.com> <EMEW3|f3c1b4957f182cbee8e02a76a09ead4dp4Y7Ye03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|03680813-07D9-459B-A229-FA974C9A4B9E@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <CAKD1Yr0E5OUsphjhEaaMTjVarSGNdPEx6e1RyKDs5A=bkHGvBg@mail.gmail.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AC992D2@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAKD1Yr1c+-S02oWF1GjTdu-Vatee-EgXLKr=2=xdtYOtUubsYQ@mail.gmail.com> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AC99354@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <B001C1A1-DCF6-43AD-A792-56A58661E924@delong.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751BD21E@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <65746D62-1F0E-4FAD-AC6A-270BD5757C8A@delong.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751BFE2D@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <F8A3E2C6-57B1-4276-93F8-86E962368182@delong.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751C0209@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <AE05ED64-72CF-4440-AFFE-C35B0353F1DA@delon! ! ! ! g.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751C05FE@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <9B3FBB40-1C85-4918-8003-3DF3FEE68B09@delong.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751C1363@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <DF584C50-315E-4A23-9920-69A424E70AC7@delong.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751C1603@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <A2C4E86C-F9DC-4A9A-9BB3-C5B6A6720D0D@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|01e2edb6f45d0a3a90659fc6f8153a47p51HYp03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|A2C4E86C-F9DC-4A9A-9BB3-C5B6A6720D0D@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751C16A4@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <DB734243-57F4-4107-9FB6-7236A1DFDCE9@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|96896e18fc012d5ab00d58d4d9082469p51Hpu03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|DB734243-57F4-4107-9FB6-7236A1DFDCE9@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|96896e18fc012d5ab00d58d4d9082469p51Hpu03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|DB734243-57F4-4107-9FB6-7236A1DFDCE9@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-A32D32F2-D448-4D6C-8D78-1BAF967BCACE"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <6EBDAA70-E2C1-47CF-9FF1-0844C8868CA5@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B350)
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-prefix-03
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 16:47:16 -0400
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "<v6ops@ietf.org>" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-prefix@tools.ietf.org" <draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-prefix@tools.ietf.org>, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 20:47:26 -0000


On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> On 2 Jun 2013, at 17:31, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:29 PM, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>>> Well, this is why the homenet arch says that prefix delegation should be efficient.  Using DHCP-PD forces a structure to the delegations, and thus potential inefficiency. The OSPF-based solution doesn't have that limitation, but then has to handle potential clashes. 
>> 
>> No it _doesn't_.   There is no reason for DHCP-PD to be inefficient.   Why do you think it has to be inefficient?
> 
> Fair point - it would be good if Fred tickled draft-baker-homenet-prefix-assignment-01 which talks about that.

Yes, draft-baker-homenet-prefix-assignment describes non-hierarchical assignment, in which all prefixes are delegates from a single server.

I'll resuscitate it, as it seems to be a useful reference for this discussion.

- Ralph

> 
> Tim
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email