Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-prefix-03
Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> Fri, 07 June 2013 06:03 UTC
Return-Path: <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919A921F91BC; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 23:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xq6a1Pv91S-k; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 23:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617C121F91BF; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 23:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j13so2747214wgh.33 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lqKl/P9qrwjme9Sh8yCnpbNxZt/aU5NxH/VA4uTCmEk=; b=ulv5FtKmxQyBPzsMsABRFHm0CCrWnCiOpcAYJp09TaKcNQKY3BVPQXnuM9g+bqb6MC SQwC7utMOtc367TlcULsFxeZb7cUlpkQKR8y2yL4JD7TbE19rTevPGN0rnSwo7Xp7jaa NVezOwDX0CTo+ZcNhDR8p9BaFvevOHBPC1lzMjL8LIsFspYXY7GVYRiPu4STto+TjU3Y Kh06ssuaAkpHIgw76I+upCzOglb5QG5finhJNMI3bFyBFCVX7Vy47Q5GX5O7lHxLI8gQ wYzbiCh3AS4wBd1SV9R5H6iTHvseCC/BwJroFtX0l7cnxM2j8GX8VEG7WjIBg67lUvbL IzbQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.11.166 with SMTP id r6mr560990wib.45.1370584992424; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.17.9 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 23:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.17.9 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 23:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9B71CE05-E12D-4FE9-8222-6FBFD7938F0C@delong.com>
References: <05DB0BDC-9B6D-4852-B878-5320ABC14D67@steffann.nl> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751C5A63@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr1tSy9XZ5A8Zc-doBTfWiPX1TkqGuJeqty9=mhwwHPRKA@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751C6F61@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <9B71CE05-E12D-4FE9-8222-6FBFD7938F0C@delong.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 08:03:11 +0200
Message-ID: <CAD77+gQv12nfuNEew8pKYRYdSk5ErHDbQ=FwgDW_-8TX5rtrdw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-prefix-03
From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c248f09bc4d404de8a2fe9"
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "<, draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-prefix@tools.ietf.org>, " <draft-jiang-v6ops-semantic-prefix@tools.ietf.org>, 6man List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 06:03:14 -0000
On Jun 6, 2013 8:58 PM, "Owen DeLong" <owen@delong.com> wrote: > While my statements in this forum are my opinion alone and not intended to represent ARIN or the AC, I think I bring a pretty good knowledge of both the letter and the intent of the policies as they exist today. Thus, it should be easy for you to point out where the policy says this. And easier to point to a discussion about the intent. > If you claim you gave a customer a /48 and the customer reports that they are not allowed to exercise control over the use of that /48, then, you have not, in fact, delegated authority over that /48 as you have claimed to ARIN and that is, in fact, resource fraud in violation of ARIN policy. I'm not sure why you think this is an absurd claim. While the customer may be allowed to use their prefix where and how they please, the policy says nothing about forcing the ISP to route everything everywhere. The ISP would not disallow usage in any way, they would simply not route according to arbitrary whims which are against their semantic policy. As an aside, handing out /56 per customer and semantic unit will most likely solve any real world problems. And if the customer really needs more than 256 semantic contexts, or more than 256 /64 per semantic context, the LIR can probably document and prove the need for more than a /48... Richard Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//draft-j… Sheng Jiang
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Duncan, Richard (Jeremy)
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Tim Chown
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… George Michaelson
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Tim Chown
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//dra… Ray Hunter
- RE: Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//dra… Sheng Jiang
- Re: Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//dra… Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Arturo Servin
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Arturo Servin
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Duncan, Richard (Jeremy)
- RE: Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//dra… Sheng Jiang
- Re: Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//dra… George Michaelson
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//dra… Ray Hunter
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- RE: Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//dra… Sheng Jiang
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Qiong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Martin Millnert
- RE: Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//dra… Sheng Jiang
- Re: Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//dra… Tim Chown
- RE: Could IPv6 address be more than locator?//dra… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Martin Millnert
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… bingxuere@gmail.com
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Shane Amante
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Tim Chown
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Tim Chown
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Tim Chown
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Bless, Roland (TM)
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ralph Droms
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ralph Droms
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Tim Chown
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ralph Droms
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… manning bill
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sander Steffann
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… manning bill
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Vízdal Aleš
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Andrew McGregor
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… manning bill
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sander Steffann
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… manning bill
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Andrew McGregor
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ivan Pepelnjak
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… George Michaelson
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… joel jaeggli
- Re: Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than l… Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… manning bill
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… manning bill
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… manning bill
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ivan Pepelnjak
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Vízdal Aleš
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… John Mann
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… manning bill
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sander Steffann
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… ian.farrer
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Vízdal Aleš
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sander Steffann
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sander Steffann
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Niall O'Reilly
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… John Curran
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… John Curran
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Richard Hartmann
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Ted Lemon
- Moderate: Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more … joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- RE: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… Jeroen Massar
- Re: [v6ops] Could IPv6 address be more than locat… joel jaeggli