[Technical Errata Reported] RFC5952 (2872)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 28 July 2011 20:19 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C605921F8B25 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.486
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.486 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.114, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09ieRz7BFuev for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAD421F8B23 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E9C0E98C4EF; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: kawamucho@mesh.ad.jp, kawashimam@vx.jp.nec.com, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net, bob.hinden@gmail.com, brian@innovationslab.net
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5952 (2872)
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20110728201942.E9C0E98C4EF@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:19:42 -0700
Cc: rjsmith2@cisco.com, ipv6@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:19:43 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5952, "A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5952&eid=2872 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Richard J. Smith <rjsmith2@cisco.com> Section: 5 Original Text ------------- For these addresses, mixed notation is RECOMMENDED if the following condition is met: the address can be distinguished as having IPv4 addresses embedded in the lower 32 bits solely from the address field through the use of a well-known prefix. Corrected Text -------------- For these addresses, mixed notation is RECOMMENDED if the following conditions are met: the address can be distinguished as having IPv4 addresses embedded in the lower 32 bits solely from the address field through the use of a well-known prefix, and the entire address is not either the unspecified IPv6 address "::" or the loopback IPv6 address "::1". Notes ----- RFC-4291 defines the 80-bit all-zeros prefix as indicating an "IPv4-compatible IPv6 address". Without further clarification in section 5 of RFC-5952, the recommended formatting of the IPv6 unspecified address would be "::0.0.0.0", and the recommended formatting of the IPv6 loopback address would be "::0.0.0.1". Neither of these recommended representations is desirable. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5952 (draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-07) -------------------------------------- Title : A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation Publication Date : August 2010 Author(s) : S. Kawamura, M. Kawashima Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IPv6 Maintenance Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5952 (2872) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5952 (2872) Masanobu Kawashima
- RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5952 (2872) Masanobu Kawashima
- RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5952 (2872) Masanobu Kawashima
- RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5952 (2872) Rich Smith (rjsmith2)
- RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5952 (2872) Rich Smith (rjsmith2)