Re: Questions from the Authors of draft-gashinsky-v6nd-enhance
Philip Homburg <pch-6man@u-1.phicoh.com> Mon, 08 August 2011 09:43 UTC
Return-Path: <pch-b29AA871B@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345F221F88A5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 02:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7BhgGLOZ6bN8 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 02:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo-6to4.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2002:8225:f03:10:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A044921F883A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 02:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (Smail #66) id m1QqMNR-0001i9C; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 11:44:05 +0200
Message-Id: <m1QqMNR-0001i9C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Subject: Re: Questions from the Authors of draft-gashinsky-v6nd-enhance
From: Philip Homburg <pch-6man@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-b29AA871B@u-1.phicoh.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 7 Aug 2011 10:57:45 -0700 ." <4CF32C15-36D0-4287-8573-ABF750F8BB08@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:43:50 +0200
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 09:43:50 -0000
In your letter dated Sun, 7 Aug 2011 10:57:45 -0700 you wrote: > B. Assumption 2 a draft updating 4861 would be a standards track = >document. I think it would be best to create a discussion document that describes the various ways that RFC-4861 can be changed to deal with remote attacks on router (and to some extent host) ND.
- Questions from the Authors of draft-gashinsky-v6n… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Questions from the Authors of draft-gashinsky… Mark Smith
- Re: Questions from the Authors of draft-gashinsky… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Questions from the Authors of draft-gashinsky… Philip Homburg
- Re: Questions from the Authors of draft-gashinsky… Warren Kumari
- RE: Questions from the Authors of draft-gashinsky… George, Wesley
- Re: Questions from the Authors of draft-gashinsky… Fred Baker
- Re: Questions from the Authors of draft-gashinsky… james woodyatt
- Re: Questions from the Authors of draft-gashinsky… Erik Nordmark
- Re: Questions from the Authors of draft-gashinsky… james woodyatt
- Re: Questions from the Authors of draft-gashinsky… james woodyatt
- Re: Questions from the Authors of draft-gashinsky… Joel Jaeggli