RE: Next Steps on DAD Improvements
Samita Chakrabarti <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com> Sat, 10 October 2015 02:02 UTC
Return-Path: <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4ED31A01FC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 19:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TVV1P5SYrsuh for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 19:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05A051A0163 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 19:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-f792c6d00000686a-c0-5618059668e1
Received: from EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.84]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F4.41.26730.69508165; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 20:21:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 22:02:31 -0400
From: Samita Chakrabarti <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Next Steps on DAD Improvements
Thread-Topic: Next Steps on DAD Improvements
Thread-Index: AQHQoiYI4qLwJB1aZUyzMOfH0VUQbp5gjQ6AgAQrOAA=
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 02:02:30 +0000
Message-ID: <ECA43DA70480A3498E43C3471FB2E1F022278B5D@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
References: <8CD12D24-FFB3-4F92-9E13-B4D9A40F3B3A@gmail.com> <5614B7CF.3000603@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <5614B7CF.3000603@acm.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ECA43DA70480A3498E43C3471FB2E1F022278B5Deusaamb103erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrKLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPiO40Vokwg0fbjS22vt/HZvHy7Hsm i/6pO5kcmD0uX/H22DnrLrvHkiU/mQKYo7hsUlJzMstSi/TtErgyrnYcYy/4GVRxb+ZytgbG qZ5djJwcEgImEvtfvWSHsMUkLtxbz9bFyMUhJHCUUeLaqv9MIAkhgWWMElMW5oLYbAJWEh29 e8AaRATSJGZ9aGMGsYUFtCV2Nr2HiutIzJmynRnCtpLoPbMVLM4ioCoxfc5dVhCbV8BXYumN wywQ8yMlLreeAKvhFFCX+LZ5G1icEeig76fWgN3ALCAucevJfCaIQwUkluw5zwxhi0q8fPyP FcJWkpi09BwrRH2+xJ95d1ggdglKnJz5hGUCo8gsJKNmISmbhaQMIq4jsWD3JzYIW1ti2cLX zDD2mQOPmZDFFzCyr2LkKC1OLctNNzLcxAiMp2MSbI47GBd8sjzEKMDBqMTDu4BBIkyINbGs uDL3EKM0B4uSOO+8GfdDhQTSE0tSs1NTC1KL4otKc1KLDzEycXBKNTAuZUpdN/fxzIAb3udz wu586evLCZcQ7bJ7eGWuRt/Nm15/lO5+8dxsc2728ychBy0+JMyTThKf9JztKpegxL4lNyau cV9945rK/UiZYvbVFgwePO9eMlRXFa4O1/kx80MI29r+72/lpslM2FtRvSfmyG51ifpqPUn+ 7EqVw4v9DBuaC+ydSv8rsRRnJBpqMRcVJwIACVWuLogCAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Df78otXvAqPdfkHoXWXo8sblI4c>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 02:02:35 -0000
I support further work on the efficient DAD solutions. In addition, I think we need a document on different ND documents available today for different deployment solutions. ND is a useful tool - but it is under-utilized due to number messaging , DAD issues and ND-DOS problems. Would like to contribute to further ND applicability beyond wired Ethernet simple subnet environment. -Samita From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Erik Nordmark Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 11:13 PM To: Bob Hinden; IPv6 List Subject: Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Bob and Ole, Did you determine any WG consensus on doing or not doing something with DAD in 6man? I didn't see any conclusion to this thread. Thanks, Erik On 6/8/15 1:02 PM, Bob Hinden wrote: At the 6man WG meeting in Dallas there was discussion on what to do (if anything) about duplicate address detection. The background on this is documented in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues/ Should we work on the robustness and efficiency issues of DAD? For example, improving DAD in environments where nodes sleep and on links with high packet loss. We think that DAD robustness and efficiency are intertwined and we need solutions that take both into account. In case the WG wants to address these issues, there is an outline of how they can be addressed in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nordmark-6man-dad-approaches/. This is probably not the only way they can be addressed, but the draft indicates that the issues are solvable. The chair would like your feedback on this issue and if there is interest we will schedule an agenda slot in Prague. Bob and Ole 6MAN Chairs -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Next Steps on DAD Improvements Bob Hinden
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements James Woodyatt
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Next Steps on DAD Improvements JOSHI, SHRINIVAS ASHOK (SHRINIVAS ASHOK)
- RE: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Greg Daley
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Ole Troan
- RE: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Greg Daley
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Ole Troan
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Ole Troan
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Tim Chown
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Tim Chown
- RE: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements 神明達哉
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Erik Nordmark
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Erik Nordmark
- RE: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Sowmini Varadhan
- RE: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Samita Chakrabarti
- Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements Bob Hinden