IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Next Steps on DAD Improvements

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 07 October 2015 07:47 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B1E1A8BB3 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 00:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oN72yGyM6ko6 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 00:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBCED1A8BBE for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 00:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8790; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444204061; x=1445413661; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=2wt2PQXO+c/MZAmtiKy/mFNRMsK16ZtmhZUZPG/cEZs=; b=iIMmDsqLMDnCVWvpfVlgGzwTIgQq0ZaRCvlGPCznPMJ5XnJGSmptPTaS d0t7J/3O73Ka4ZlbcinIdjZ2YS6Ssmy2qKElwq9SZFbn9HFbie63JKSQ0 +9BS53KRzKzyPuH3vUfQLjHcJV2R1pjalxI1XrtqOwRqWEcFLZmvibEj6 w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DyAQBFzRRW/49dJa1eglpNVG4GvhIBDYFaFwEJhXkCgT04FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQmAQEBBAEBASpBGwIBCBEEAQEWEgchBgsUCQgCBAESCBOHfgMSDbtUDYUeAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSGc4R+glCCOQoBCoQkBYc4jk0BhReGDIFsgV6SU4Nag24BHwEBQoIRHYFUcYZmgQYBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.17,648,1437436800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="33302517"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2015 07:47:40 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t977le5b014083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 7 Oct 2015 07:47:40 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 02:47:39 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Wed, 7 Oct 2015 02:47:39 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Next Steps on DAD Improvements
Thread-Topic: Next Steps on DAD Improvements
Thread-Index: AQHRAMc642AmlP8w3k2EQa3KN4uztJ5fpecA
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 07:47:23 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 07:46:46 +0000
Message-ID: <8e614e050a9c420097d9bfd492b849a1@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <8CD12D24-FFB3-4F92-9E13-B4D9A40F3B3A@gmail.com> <5614B7CF.3000603@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <5614B7CF.3000603@acm.org>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.228.42.68]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8e614e050a9c420097d9bfd492b849a1XCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/yGGoISpC9cZpsDxUTkHsRFzRqA4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 07:47:44 -0000

Neither:

I fully support that 6MAN takes the action item. I'm willing to contribute.

Cheers,

Pascal

From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Erik Nordmark
Sent: mercredi 7 octobre 2015 08:13
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>; IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Next Steps on DAD Improvements


Bob and Ole,

Did you determine any WG consensus on doing or not doing something with DAD in 6man?
I didn't see any conclusion to this thread.

Thanks,
   Erik

On 6/8/15 1:02 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:

At the 6man WG meeting in Dallas there was discussion on what to do (if anything) about duplicate address detection.  The background on this is documented in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yourtchenko-6man-dad-issues/



Should we work on the robustness and efficiency issues of DAD?  For example, improving DAD in environments where nodes sleep and on links with high packet loss.  We think that DAD robustness and efficiency are intertwined and we need solutions that take both into account.



In case the WG wants to address these issues, there is an outline of how they can be addressed in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nordmark-6man-dad-approaches/.  This is probably not the only way they can be addressed, but the draft indicates that the issues are solvable.



The chair would like your feedback on this issue and if there is interest we will schedule an agenda slot in Prague.



Bob and Ole

6MAN Chairs








--------------------------------------------------------------------

IETF IPv6 working group mailing list

ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>

Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6

--------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email